Difference between revisions of "Talk:Integer"
From Conservapedia
BRichtigen (Talk | contribs) |
(help me reduce the confusion please) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
:I'd prefer the ''standard'' of [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/WholeNumber.html MathWorld]. We should try to avoid the intrinsic ambiguity of the term ''whole numbers'' --[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 17:25, 19 November 2008 (EST) | :I'd prefer the ''standard'' of [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/WholeNumber.html MathWorld]. We should try to avoid the intrinsic ambiguity of the term ''whole numbers'' --[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 17:25, 19 November 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Still confusing== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Coming back almost 5 years later, I see confusion between university-level definitions which only 1% of our readers will care about, and elementary school usage. Let's put the [[formal definition]]s at the end of the article, in case anyone needs that advanced info - but let's not confuse the ordinary or typical reader. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 09:03, 22 February 2013 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 14:03, February 22, 2013
- positive integers: are these called counting numbers, natural numbers, or whole numbers?
- zero and the positive integers: what are these called (besides "nonnegative integers"?)
We need to provide simple and reliable definitions. Students are looking to us for answers. --Ed Poor Talk 12:27, 19 November 2008 (EST)
I like this web site:
http://www.mathsisfun.com/whole-numbers.html
Counting Numbers: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, …
Including zero we get Whole Numbers: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, …
Allowing negatives => Integers: ... -5, -4, -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, …
- I'd prefer the standard of MathWorld. We should try to avoid the intrinsic ambiguity of the term whole numbers --BRichtigen 17:25, 19 November 2008 (EST)
Still confusing
Coming back almost 5 years later, I see confusion between university-level definitions which only 1% of our readers will care about, and elementary school usage. Let's put the formal definitions at the end of the article, in case anyone needs that advanced info - but let's not confuse the ordinary or typical reader. --Ed Poor Talk 09:03, 22 February 2013 (EST)
