Changes

1 byte added ,  04:39, December 6, 2008
plan to add citations to this and expand!
Line 8: Line 8:  
*''[[Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife]]''
 
*''[[Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife]]''
   −
In [[Establishment Clause]] cases, plaintiffs challenge religion in public life based on two separate types of standing: (1) taxpayer standing, and (2) non-economic injury, such as alleged offense or feeling of exclusion.  ''See Flast v. Cohen''; ''and Hein v. Freedom from Religion Foundation''.
+
In [[Establishment Clause]] cases, plaintiffs challenge religion in public life based on two separate types of standing: (1) taxpayer standing, and (2) non-economic injury, such as alleged offense or feeling of exclusion.  ''See Flast v. Cohen''; ''and Hein v. Freedom from Religion Foundation''.  
    
[[Category:law]]
 
[[Category:law]]