Difference between revisions of "Talk:Inferior good"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Change example??) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Maybe we ''should'' change that example. Burgers are burgers! McDonald's is an unconvincing "step up" from any sort of food![[User:SJames|SJames]] 08:39, 15 December 2008 (EST) | :Maybe we ''should'' change that example. Burgers are burgers! McDonald's is an unconvincing "step up" from any sort of food![[User:SJames|SJames]] 08:39, 15 December 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Interestingly enough, there have been a number of news reports lately saying that McDonalds' sales and revenues are up. I understand the attempt at humor in the article, but it may actually be inaccurate! --[[User:Economist|Economist]] 19:15, 5 February 2009 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 00:15, February 6, 2009
HUMPH! White Castle's are a particular kind of burger (sometimes called "sliders") and aren't inferior(!) to McDonald's.
Ok, not really upset.heheheheeh but still. :D Aziraphale 20:50, 16 July 2007 (EDT)
- Maybe we should change that example. Burgers are burgers! McDonald's is an unconvincing "step up" from any sort of food!SJames 08:39, 15 December 2008 (EST)
Interestingly enough, there have been a number of news reports lately saying that McDonalds' sales and revenues are up. I understand the attempt at humor in the article, but it may actually be inaccurate! --Economist 19:15, 5 February 2009 (EST)