Changes

==Vitz and Creativity==

==Vitz and Creativity==

Vitz has argued that the academic idea of creativity since the 19th century is completely wrong.  Instead Vitz suggests a different definition of creativity<ref> [http://books.google.com/books?id=dl77RyqE4RgC ''Psychology As Religion: The Cult of Self-Worship''] (Wm. B. Eerdmans 1977), p. 63</ref>

Vitz has argued that the academic idea of creativity since the 19th century is completely wrong.  Instead Vitz suggests a different definition of creativity<ref> [http://books.google.com/books?id=dl77RyqE4RgC ''Psychology As Religion: The Cult of Self-Worship''] (Wm. B. Eerdmans 1977), p. 63</ref>:

{{cquote|For a Christian, however, all creativity has its origin in God; and to claim that an individual human is really creative is either silly or blasphemous. A person can express his ividvidual capacity in a creative fashion only by aligning himself with God's will. Real creativity requires a soul cooperating with God&mdash; a soul who becomes God's loving agent in all its activity however mundane.}}  

{{cquote|For a Christian, however, all creativity has its origin in God; and to claim that an individual human is really creative is either silly or blasphemous. A person can express his individual capacity in a creative fashion only by aligning himself with God's will. Real creativity requires a soul cooperating with God&mdash; a soul who becomes God's loving agent in all its activity however mundane.}}

 

==Works==

==Works==

*[http://books.google.com/books?id=dl77RyqE4RgC ''Psychology As Religion: The Cult of Self-Worship''] (Wm. B. Eerdmans 1977, 1994 2nd Ed.)

*[http://books.google.com/books?id=dl77RyqE4RgC ''Psychology As Religion: The Cult of Self-Worship''] (Wm. B. Eerdmans 1977, 1994 2nd Ed.)