| Line 201: |
Line 201: |
| | ::Dude, you really need to breathe a little, maybe count to ten before typing. Who exactly are you addressing with that? [[User:Myk|Myk]] 03:35, 23 March 2007 (EDT) | | ::Dude, you really need to breathe a little, maybe count to ten before typing. Who exactly are you addressing with that? [[User:Myk|Myk]] 03:35, 23 March 2007 (EDT) |
| | | | |
| | + | ::First, I should add that I looked at RobS contribution when he was mangling the Hitler article, and I was surprised that he did indeed write some decent and good articles. The more I was puzzled, why he did so poor on the Hitler article. There he mostly added factual errors. In the article about ''Liberals'' he did not add too many factual errors, but turned a fairly factual article written with a conservative perspective, into an opinion piece. And added a few factual errors. I mean, if the liberal party of Austria looks left-wing to you (this is party where Haider was chairman), I have to assume that you are even more right wing than Haider. Many conservatives in the US aren't. |
| | | | |
| − | ::First, I should add that I looked at RobS contribution when he was mangling the Hitler article, and I was surprised that he did indeed write some decent and good articles. There more I was puzzled, why he did so poor on the Hitler article. There he mostly added factual error. In the article about ''Liberals'' he did not put factual errors, but turned a fairly factual article written with a conservative perspective, into an opinion piece. And added a few factual errors. I mean if the liberal party of Austria looks left-wing to you (this is party where Haider was chairman), I have to assume that you are even more right wing than Haider. Many conservatives in the US aren't.
| + | But the points, even if you agree with what RobS says, its is still an opinion, and has no place in an encyclopedic article. And I can see someone who is not exposed to the world outside of the US can make a mistake, in assessing European liberal parties, he should then at least look at the talk page, do a bit of research, and not start the entire discussion all over again. This is not about content, it's about style. And RobS style is that he abuses his sysop privileges.[[User:Order]] 23 March 19:10 (AEST) |
| − | | |
| − | But the points, even if you agree with what RobS says, its is still an opinion, and has no place in an encyclopedic article. And I can see someone who is not exposed to the world outside of the US can make a mistake, in assessing European liberal parties, he should then at least look at the talk page, do a bit of research, and not start the entire discussion all over again. This is not about content, it's about style. And RobS style is that he abuses his sysop priviledges.[[User:Order]] 23 March 19:10 (AEST) | |
| − | | |
| | | | |
| | *The culture here, dude. Most of the above should have been on the talk page at Liberal, I guess, or at RobS's talk page. Everything under the sun, to some, seems to be "abuse". It is rapidly becoming the most over-used word in the world. Whatever happened to actually chatting with one another, directly? I guess most of you won't get it. :S --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|Talk2Me!]]</sup> 04:02, 23 March 2007 (EDT) | | *The culture here, dude. Most of the above should have been on the talk page at Liberal, I guess, or at RobS's talk page. Everything under the sun, to some, seems to be "abuse". It is rapidly becoming the most over-used word in the world. Whatever happened to actually chatting with one another, directly? I guess most of you won't get it. :S --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|Talk2Me!]]</sup> 04:02, 23 March 2007 (EDT) |