Difference between revisions of "User:Jpatt/subpage02"
(New page: ==subpage02==) |
(some thoughts on BO birth certificate) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | == | + | ==If Obama is allowed to take office without proving his citizenship, then we have no Constitution== |
| + | |||
| + | So now what? What is to be said of all that has transpired? Has the Constitution suffered a hit? | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Constitution has suffered since the Roe V. Wade decision. Clinton further plunged America into 'Change' with his policies and by his refusal to step down for perjury. Liberals spew claim to the false notion that Bush ruined the Constitution, freedoms lost. They never can name a freedom that you and me no longer have. Then Barack Hussein Obama enters the scene. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Requests for Obama's birth certificate was denied early in the campaign. Liberal hate mongers DailyKos posts a copy of the birth certificate on their website. The Obama campaign confirms it is Obama's certificate and hopefullty puts the matter to rest. Immediately, questions were raised as to the authenticity of the document. The source credibility, the outright forgery documented by independent analysis. At that point, Obama should have been obligated to provide his original certificate. Again, the Obama campaign hid, ran from the issue. They refused to cooperate in the slightest. Even when requested by a court of law, Obama and gang successfully denied all reasons to provide this document. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Enter www.factcheck.org, the owner of 'factcheck', Annenburg of Chicago, Illinois. The same organization William Ayers was involved with, controlling $50 million dollar challenge. They were the next recipient to view Obama's birth certificate. This time the disputed seal was determined to be raised authentic. But many of the remaining questions, such as African designation of his father, were not consistent with documents issued by the state of Hawaii. Annenburg's Fact-Check deems the document authentic. | ||
| + | |||
| + | After multiple lawsuits across the nation, no evidence was required of Barack Hussein Obama. The last person with authority to review the document was a healthcare bigwig in the Hawaii government. Confirming once again it is authentic. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The fact-finding to determine the authenticity of Obama's birth certificate was more than a difficult process. The courts were compromised by partisan Democrats. The actual merits of the case, the ability of Americans to have the right to confirm without a doubt, the stonewalling, the corrupt media .... it was disastrous to the Constitution. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Where do we go from here? We fight on! --[[User:Jpatt|jpatt]] 01:10, 13 February 2009 (EST) | ||
| + | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ||
| + | Comments? | ||
Revision as of 06:10, February 13, 2009
If Obama is allowed to take office without proving his citizenship, then we have no Constitution
So now what? What is to be said of all that has transpired? Has the Constitution suffered a hit?
The Constitution has suffered since the Roe V. Wade decision. Clinton further plunged America into 'Change' with his policies and by his refusal to step down for perjury. Liberals spew claim to the false notion that Bush ruined the Constitution, freedoms lost. They never can name a freedom that you and me no longer have. Then Barack Hussein Obama enters the scene.
Requests for Obama's birth certificate was denied early in the campaign. Liberal hate mongers DailyKos posts a copy of the birth certificate on their website. The Obama campaign confirms it is Obama's certificate and hopefullty puts the matter to rest. Immediately, questions were raised as to the authenticity of the document. The source credibility, the outright forgery documented by independent analysis. At that point, Obama should have been obligated to provide his original certificate. Again, the Obama campaign hid, ran from the issue. They refused to cooperate in the slightest. Even when requested by a court of law, Obama and gang successfully denied all reasons to provide this document.
Enter www.factcheck.org, the owner of 'factcheck', Annenburg of Chicago, Illinois. The same organization William Ayers was involved with, controlling $50 million dollar challenge. They were the next recipient to view Obama's birth certificate. This time the disputed seal was determined to be raised authentic. But many of the remaining questions, such as African designation of his father, were not consistent with documents issued by the state of Hawaii. Annenburg's Fact-Check deems the document authentic.
After multiple lawsuits across the nation, no evidence was required of Barack Hussein Obama. The last person with authority to review the document was a healthcare bigwig in the Hawaii government. Confirming once again it is authentic.
The fact-finding to determine the authenticity of Obama's birth certificate was more than a difficult process. The courts were compromised by partisan Democrats. The actual merits of the case, the ability of Americans to have the right to confirm without a doubt, the stonewalling, the corrupt media .... it was disastrous to the Constitution.
Where do we go from here? We fight on! --jpatt 01:10, 13 February 2009 (EST)
Comments?