Difference between revisions of "User talk:DunsScotus"
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
You can decide whether that is good or bad. Your submissions are interesting enough that I don't want to miss anything, espicially the subtext, but maybe I'm crazy. Whom gods would destroy (oops, God)...[[User:Palmd001|Palmd001]] 15:55, 23 March 2007 (EDT) | You can decide whether that is good or bad. Your submissions are interesting enough that I don't want to miss anything, espicially the subtext, but maybe I'm crazy. Whom gods would destroy (oops, God)...[[User:Palmd001|Palmd001]] 15:55, 23 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| − | I am also watching him. Too many people on this site don't seem to take it seriously, although Duns is not afraid to speak the truth and present the facts which we can all see in the Bible. | + | I am also watching him. Too many people on this site don't seem to take it seriously, although Duns is not afraid to speak the truth and present the facts which we can all see in the Bible. [[User:touchedbyabear|touchedbyabear]] 15:58, 23 March 2007 (EDT) |
Revision as of 20:00, March 23, 2007
I hope you can provide a good citation for this claim. Otherwise, it will get removed pretty quickly. --Hojimachongtalk 14:20, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
- The transport of animal and plant species by large scale weather phenomena is well established. DunsScotus 14:26, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
- If so, then it should be easy for you to find a citation. --Hojimachongtalk 14:28, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
- already did DunsScotus 14:30, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
Squid and such like.
"Interesting" edits Duns, but I rather suspect that you may be over-egging it. I don't get the impression that leg-pulling is taken to lightly here.--British_cons (talk) 15:01, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
- British_cons, as church father Martin Luther once said, "here I stand, I can do no other!" I am not going to be browbeat or intimidated into recanting my conservative principles. Again, as national father and influential conservative Barry Goldwater once said, "extremism in the defense of virtue is no vice." I support God and Country, and that's all I need to know.
- Yes, I see. It's rather a shame there is no discussion topic along the lines of "Who was the more liberal: Genghis Khan or Atilla the Hun" as I imagine you could profitably contribute. I'm surprised that I've not seen you on the Flat Earth Society article.--British_cons (talk) 15:42, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
- Easy answer, Cons. Atilla was significantly more liberal (or anti-conservative, as the case may be) because he ran his organization on a communist model (significant redistribution of income, etc.) and also actively worked to destroy the Roman empire through pillaging and sexual immorality. Khan was a proud general and father of millions (literally) who ushered in a new age of prosperity for his citizens/subjects.[1] DunsScotus 15:51, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
- I would have expected no less than you would be to the right of Atilla the Hun. errrr literally.--British_cons (talk) 15:58, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
- Easy answer, Cons. Atilla was significantly more liberal (or anti-conservative, as the case may be) because he ran his organization on a communist model (significant redistribution of income, etc.) and also actively worked to destroy the Roman empire through pillaging and sexual immorality. Khan was a proud general and father of millions (literally) who ushered in a new age of prosperity for his citizens/subjects.[1] DunsScotus 15:51, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
- Yes, I see. It's rather a shame there is no discussion topic along the lines of "Who was the more liberal: Genghis Khan or Atilla the Hun" as I imagine you could profitably contribute. I'm surprised that I've not seen you on the Flat Earth Society article.--British_cons (talk) 15:42, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
I am watching you
You can decide whether that is good or bad. Your submissions are interesting enough that I don't want to miss anything, espicially the subtext, but maybe I'm crazy. Whom gods would destroy (oops, God)...Palmd001 15:55, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
I am also watching him. Too many people on this site don't seem to take it seriously, although Duns is not afraid to speak the truth and present the facts which we can all see in the Bible. touchedbyabear 15:58, 23 March 2007 (EDT)