Difference between revisions of "Talk:Welfare"
(→Image) |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
I wonder the same thing. The image seems to be a bit of a non sequitur. --[[User:Economist|Economist]] 17:27, 13 February 2009 (EST) | I wonder the same thing. The image seems to be a bit of a non sequitur. --[[User:Economist|Economist]] 17:27, 13 February 2009 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Welfare== | ||
| + | Clinton signed GOP legislation cutting back welfare, just so you know who is credited for that success. Also, the U.S. Constitution says to "promote the general welfare", this doesn't mean "fund" the general welfare. Also, it is the same excuse Democrats use for implementing the unconstitutional [[ObamaCare]] package. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 18:37, 29 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 22:37, October 29, 2009
On the Reference
Whoever added "Jackson" - needs to fully cite the source in a "references section". Just saying "Jackson, 2005" doesn't really explain anything - and therefore the reference is questionable.--IDuan 15:45, 22 November 2007 (EST)
Citations Needed
This entire article needs citations. Welfare has been growing... It's also too simple. It is no longer called Welfare, and the concept has changed dramatically since its inception. I'm giving anyone who wants to look at it 1 day. After that, I'm giving it the scrubbing of its life. JohnGalt 17:33, 30 November 2007 (EST)
Image
Why's there a picture of a bank on an article about welfare? HDCase 17:00, 30 November 2008 (EST)
I wonder the same thing. The image seems to be a bit of a non sequitur. --Economist 17:27, 13 February 2009 (EST)
Welfare
Clinton signed GOP legislation cutting back welfare, just so you know who is credited for that success. Also, the U.S. Constitution says to "promote the general welfare", this doesn't mean "fund" the general welfare. Also, it is the same excuse Democrats use for implementing the unconstitutional ObamaCare package. --Jpatt 18:37, 29 October 2009 (EDT)
