2
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 87:
Line 87: + +
Debate:If there is no objective truth, then is the claim "there is no objective truth" also not an objective truth? (view source)
Revision as of 02:01, October 8, 2009
, 02:01, October 8, 2009no edit summary
I think this is a stupid debate topic! -Racecarlock
I think this is a stupid debate topic! -Racecarlock
If I think I exist would'nt I have to in fact exist because to think must imply existance. How can you think if you dont exist? So the fact that I think I exist leads to actual existance means that my existance is an objective truth. I in fact do exist. Not to infer that you must think to exist, but thinking must imply existance. So existance is an objective truth. So the statment is inherently wrong. There are objective truths. The problem is that humans are 100% objective. The thought of existing is an subjective truth in itself but has to lead to the objective truth that existance exists.