Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
reply
Line 261: Line 261:     
::I have not seen a rebuttal from SJohnson in the four days since my last post, although he has added new material to the content page since then. In light of this, I would appreciate some guidelines as to when it is appropriate for me to add my information and references to the content page. I can add citations from the primary mathematical literature if necessary, but in general I find that these are less helpful as they are not easily accessible by readers without access to academic libraries.--[[User:ElyM|ElyM]] 18:07, 18 March 2009 (EDT)
 
::I have not seen a rebuttal from SJohnson in the four days since my last post, although he has added new material to the content page since then. In light of this, I would appreciate some guidelines as to when it is appropriate for me to add my information and references to the content page. I can add citations from the primary mathematical literature if necessary, but in general I find that these are less helpful as they are not easily accessible by readers without access to academic libraries.--[[User:ElyM|ElyM]] 18:07, 18 March 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
::: You say, "I'm not sure why you expect me to address Blout's use of Monte Carlo."  The reason is obvious:  the title of the content page is the "Significance of E. Coli Evolution Experiments."  You haven't addressed the inappropriateness of using Monte Carlo simulations for assessing the significance rarely occurring events, which was central to Lenski's statistical claims.  I suggest you address this flaw if you want to be taken seriously.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:12, 18 March 2009 (EDT)
    
== References ==
 
== References ==
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}
Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,790

edits

Navigation menu