Changes

127 bytes added ,  23:35, March 25, 2007
Line 18: Line 18:  
==Sources needed==
 
==Sources needed==
 
This article gives a definition of "theory" that differs sharply from common dictionaries, popular usage, and the rest of Conservapedia. Just one dubious reference is provided. If this is really a good definition, then there should be some citations to people who use the word this way. Otherwise, the article should be scrapped and rewritten to conform to common usage. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 05:17, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
 
This article gives a definition of "theory" that differs sharply from common dictionaries, popular usage, and the rest of Conservapedia. Just one dubious reference is provided. If this is really a good definition, then there should be some citations to people who use the word this way. Otherwise, the article should be scrapped and rewritten to conform to common usage. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 05:17, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
Now the article cites Wikipedia 3 times! It really needs an overhaul. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 19:35, 25 March 2007 (EDT)