Changes

411 bytes added ,  22:16, May 23, 2009
→‎Federalism: new section
Line 338: Line 338:     
::Bush and Reagan were Republicans, no doubt about that. But Reagan was the quintessential conservative, while Bush seems to have signed a lot of bills that a genuine conservative would have vetoed. I'd like to know what Dubya's role in the [[housing bubble]] was, because I don't think Democrats deserve all the blame. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:13, 30 March 2009 (EDT)
 
::Bush and Reagan were Republicans, no doubt about that. But Reagan was the quintessential conservative, while Bush seems to have signed a lot of bills that a genuine conservative would have vetoed. I'd like to know what Dubya's role in the [[housing bubble]] was, because I don't think Democrats deserve all the blame. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:13, 30 March 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Federalism ==
 +
 +
Federalism doesn't necessarily refer to the idea that the states should retain more power than the federal government, only to the notion that the states and national government can coexist as sovereign entities with supremacy over their respective domains. "Federalism" ought to be changed to "states' rights" or "limited government." --[[User:Economist|Economist]] 18:16, 23 May 2009 (EDT)
342

edits