2,732
edits
Changes
→[[User:Tmtoulouse]] blocked?
'''Re block times:''' in [http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,2042231,00.html this newspaper article] about Wikipedia, an admin who reverts large quantities of vandalism says "The standard way to stop a vandal is to 'revert' their changes and leave a warning on their personal user page. Most then lose interest, but if they persist Knott will block them for a limited period, say 31 hours, or longer if they are a repeat offender. 'We tend to keep blocks short and sweet, and that seems to work.'" [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 11:15, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
'''Re block times:''' in [http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,2042231,00.html this newspaper article] about Wikipedia, an admin who reverts large quantities of vandalism says "The standard way to stop a vandal is to 'revert' their changes and leave a warning on their personal user page. Most then lose interest, but if they persist Knott will block them for a limited period, say 31 hours, or longer if they are a repeat offender. 'We tend to keep blocks short and sweet, and that seems to work.'" [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 11:15, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
:<nowiki>{{sarcasm}}</nowiki>Whoa there Smith! Careful with citing Wikipedia! This is Conservapedia, you know, not one of those liberal pieces of trash that actually discusses science!!!-'''<font color="#007FFF">[[user:AmesG|Ames]]</font><font color="#FF0000">[[user talk:AmesG|G]]</font>''' 11:21, 25 March 2007 (EDT)