122
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 43:
Line 43: + + +
"INITIAL RESULTS OF THE NAVSTAR GPS NTS-2 SATELLITE" [James A Buisson, Roger L. Easton, Thomas B. McCaskill U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL)]
::::Read up on GPS -- it does not need relativity. I have reverted your censorship. [[User:BHarlan|BHarlan]] 16:04, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
::::Read up on GPS -- it does not need relativity. I have reverted your censorship. [[User:BHarlan|BHarlan]] 16:04, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
::::I think, given your superior knowledge on relativity, maybe you could comment on the following article to enlighten us censoring physicists.
"INITIAL RESULTS OF THE NAVSTAR GPS NTS-2 SATELLITE" [James A Buisson, Roger L. Easton, Thomas B. McCaskill U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL)]: . I cite: "The (T-O) slope gives the frequency offset of +442.5 pp1012 with respect to the PMA clock. Inclusion of the PMA frequency offset of +0.6 pp1012 produces an NTS measured value of +443.1 pp1012. Comparison of this value to the predicted value of the relativistic offset of +445.0 pp1012 gives a difference of -3.1 "
:: Thanks for the generous offer. Taken the average quality of the articles here about natural sciences i would be more on the side of improving them (which is what I do when i see an easy to correct definitive mistake). Up to that time i will rely on textbooks and the original articles in the libraries. --[[User:Stitch75|Stitch75]] 10:26, 23 March 2009 (EDT)
:: Thanks for the generous offer. Taken the average quality of the articles here about natural sciences i would be more on the side of improving them (which is what I do when i see an easy to correct definitive mistake). Up to that time i will rely on textbooks and the original articles in the libraries. --[[User:Stitch75|Stitch75]] 10:26, 23 March 2009 (EDT)