nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Conservapedia:Featured articles (view source)
Revision as of 10:28, April 8, 2009
, 10:28, April 8, 2009→Proposed for featuring: Voting
:* Agree. --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''nandeyanen?'']]</sup> 03:19, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
:* Agree. --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''nandeyanen?'']]</sup> 03:19, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
:* Disagree. Too many redlinks. At least start stubs for the roster members. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 09:55, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
:* Disagree. Too many redlinks. At least start stubs for the roster members. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 09:55, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
:* Disagree. Before moving on to European Football, I think we should feature American Baseball, Football or Basketball. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 06:28, 8 April 2009 (EDT)
}}
}}
:* Agree. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 08:11, 5 April 2009 (EDT)
:* Agree. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 08:11, 5 April 2009 (EDT)
:* Agree. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 09:55, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
:* Agree. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 09:55, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
:* Agree. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 06:28, 8 April 2009 (EDT)
}}
}}
:* Disagree. (''It is a very good article, well written and reasoned. My primary concern, looking at it within the context of the featured article is that it is more of an "opinion piece" and I felt that on those grounds it did not really suit my criteria for a "featured article". Where I do think it could be used, would be under the mainpage's "Highlighted article", which would mean that not only could it be featured for longer, but would be more in line with the aims of that section.'')--[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''nandeyanen?'']]</sup> 03:19, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
:* Disagree. (''It is a very good article, well written and reasoned. My primary concern, looking at it within the context of the featured article is that it is more of an "opinion piece" and I felt that on those grounds it did not really suit my criteria for a "featured article". Where I do think it could be used, would be under the mainpage's "Highlighted article", which would mean that not only could it be featured for longer, but would be more in line with the aims of that section.'')--[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''nandeyanen?'']]</sup> 03:19, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
:* Agree. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 09:55, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
:* Agree. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 09:55, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
:* Agree. This is a superlative and positive-message essay. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 06:28, 8 April 2009 (EDT)
}}
}}