Changes

515 bytes added ,  21:34, April 1, 2007
In anticipation
Line 142: Line 142:  
::In fact, the court couldn't "heavily rely" on Selman, because that was another district court decision with no precedential value. Even the vacating of Selman wouldn't have precedent for a PA district court, they're in different circuits. Do they teach about those in homeschool? [[User:Lawrah|Lawrah]] 23:58, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 
::In fact, the court couldn't "heavily rely" on Selman, because that was another district court decision with no precedential value. Even the vacating of Selman wouldn't have precedent for a PA district court, they're in different circuits. Do they teach about those in homeschool? [[User:Lawrah|Lawrah]] 23:58, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:I added the link to the opinion [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] 00:15, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:I added the link to the opinion [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] 00:15, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
== In anticipation ==
 +
 +
RSchlafly, I look forward to another edit war with you.  These always end with you getting confused, and then me getting banned for a day.  Anywho, my version of this article is superior.  Yours is full of bias words like "merely," et al, while mine gives the actual cited legal analysis and purpose of the stickers.  Settle it here.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 17:34, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
2,732

edits