Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
6,613
edits
Changes
→Hahaha: can you improve?
==Hahaha==
==Hahaha==
This wiki makes me laugh. Much like Fox News, it claims to be unbiased but instead portrays only one side of the situation. Can you possibly say the [[Barack Obama]] article is unbiased? Ahahahah. This wiki was supposedly created because Wikipedia was too biased in liberals' favor, but the funny thing is, this wiki is ten times more biased than Wikipedia could ever hope to be. [[User:Scarecrowk|Scarecrowk]]
This wiki makes me laugh. Much like Fox News, it claims to be unbiased but instead portrays only one side of the situation. Can you possibly say the [[Barack Obama]] article is unbiased? Ahahahah. This wiki was supposedly created because Wikipedia was too biased in liberals' favor, but the funny thing is, this wiki is ten times more biased than Wikipedia could ever hope to be. [[User:Scarecrowk|Scarecrowk]]
:It's all very well to laugh, but perhaps you could work to improve what you think is lacking instead? New contributors are always welcome here.
:Also note that Conservapedia doesn't claim to be unbiased - it openly has a declared US conservative point of view. Otherwise it would have to be called Unbiasedopaedia!--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 07:49, 21 May 2009 (EDT)