Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
73 bytes added ,  14:58, May 24, 2009
no edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:     
==Anti-business bans==
 
==Anti-business bans==
Concern over the negative health aspects of trans fat has led to several anti-business bans on trans fats in places such as New York City, Boston and the state of California<ref>http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/07/25/RV9N11VMPR.DTL</ref>, usually instated by [[liberal]] politicians. These bans, while lowering consumption levels of trans fat, absolve the blame from the consumer who chooses to eat trans fats, and instead places the burden on often struggling restaurants and chefs who have been left wondering "how the trans fat ban will affect the bottom line".[2]
+
Concern over the negative health aspects of trans fat has led to several anti-business bans on trans fats in places such as New York City, Boston and the state of California<ref>http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/07/25/RV9N11VMPR.DTL</ref>, usually instated by [[liberal]] politicians. These bans, while lowering consumption levels of trans fat, absolve the blame from the consumer who chooses to eat trans fats, and instead places the burden on often struggling restaurants and chefs who have been left wondering "how the trans fat ban will affect the bottom line"<ref>http://www.zagat.com/Blog/Detail.aspx?SNP=NLA&SCID=37&BLGID=13729</ref>.  
    
==Other solutions==
 
==Other solutions==
6,631

edits

Navigation menu