11
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: +
Argument from poor design (view source)
Revision as of 22:27, August 25, 2010
, 22:27, August 25, 2010no edit summary
#Even if a poor design were shown, it would not counter the other aspects of creation that are unarguably the result of good design; since an absolute rule can be disproved by a single counterexample, a single showing of a biological feature that is unarguably designed and designed well suffices to disprove the argument from poor design.
#Even if a poor design were shown, it would not counter the other aspects of creation that are unarguably the result of good design; since an absolute rule can be disproved by a single counterexample, a single showing of a biological feature that is unarguably designed and designed well suffices to disprove the argument from poor design.
#What appears to be poor design could actually be a result of the [[Fall of Man]].
#What appears to be poor design could actually be a result of the [[Fall of Man]].
#God did not design organisms to be perfect. To do so would be to create an equal of Himself.
[[Category:Creationism]]
[[Category:Creationism]]
[[Category:Evolution]]
[[Category:Evolution]]
[[Category:Intelligent Design]]
[[Category:Intelligent Design]]