nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
User talk:CPWebmaster/Archive1 (view source)
Revision as of 21:55, March 28, 2007
, 21:55, March 28, 2007→[[Conservapedia:Request Unprotection]]
I see that [[Conservapedia:Request Unprotection]] was deleted... is there a better place to request unprotection of pages once their problems have passed? Currently, it seems like there are a number of pages that remain protected for a very long time without an obvious reason (eg. [[Jesus]] for 33 days with an edit summary of "temporary protection", [[abortion]] for 26 days, [[George W. Bush]] for 16 days, [[Talk:Canadian newspapers]] for 16 days, [[Dick Cheney]] for 14 days, [[Biblical creation account]] for 14 days, [[Talk:18 USC § 1030]] for 9 days, [[Fox News Channel]] for 9 days with an edit summary of "Will remove in couple of days", etc...). Without users being able to point these out, it seems likely that they'd remain protected for an extended period of time. If there's no other better venue, could [[Conservapedia:Request Unprotection]] be restored? --[[User:Interiot|Interiot]] 14:53, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
I see that [[Conservapedia:Request Unprotection]] was deleted... is there a better place to request unprotection of pages once their problems have passed? Currently, it seems like there are a number of pages that remain protected for a very long time without an obvious reason (eg. [[Jesus]] for 33 days with an edit summary of "temporary protection", [[abortion]] for 26 days, [[George W. Bush]] for 16 days, [[Talk:Canadian newspapers]] for 16 days, [[Dick Cheney]] for 14 days, [[Biblical creation account]] for 14 days, [[Talk:18 USC § 1030]] for 9 days, [[Fox News Channel]] for 9 days with an edit summary of "Will remove in couple of days", etc...). Without users being able to point these out, it seems likely that they'd remain protected for an extended period of time. If there's no other better venue, could [[Conservapedia:Request Unprotection]] be restored? --[[User:Interiot|Interiot]] 14:53, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
*So, because you deem whatever problem there was is past, that should be the deciding factor in opening them? There are some topics so problematic here, like on other on-line, user edited encyclopedia's, I rather suspect, ''like there'', they will never be opened to general user editing. But I feel confident, Interiot, that there are tens of thousands of topics not yet created, or needing more than their one sentence, that could use your attention. ;-) --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 17:55, 28 March 2007 (EDT)