| Line 250: |
Line 250: |
| | :I didn't block him or have anything to do with his blocking. I was just trying to let you know what happened. <font color="FFD700">[[User:ColinR|ColinR]]</font><sup><font color="000000">[[User_talk:ColinR|talk]]</font></sup> 04:54, 25 March 2007 (EDT) | | :I didn't block him or have anything to do with his blocking. I was just trying to let you know what happened. <font color="FFD700">[[User:ColinR|ColinR]]</font><sup><font color="000000">[[User_talk:ColinR|talk]]</font></sup> 04:54, 25 March 2007 (EDT) |
| | *Dew was kind enough to fill me in, and un-delete his user talk page. I appreciate you trying to fill me in. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 05:14, 25 March 2007 (EDT) | | *Dew was kind enough to fill me in, and un-delete his user talk page. I appreciate you trying to fill me in. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 05:14, 25 March 2007 (EDT) |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Richard's Hit List==
| |
| − | An inherently abusive article. Should be removed. [[User:Palmd001|PalMD]] 20:32, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
| |
| − | :Can you link to that? I can't find it.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 20:42, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Check it out. [[User talk:Richard/Conservapedia Liberal List]]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Mr. PalMD has whined about this on several talk pages. He asked to be added. I added him. It is just a list of people I want to monitor closely (I have a bad memory and it helps to have links close to the task at hand). Many liberals have even been helpful in identifying themselves. It is only used to monitor liberal bias. Although one other sysop has helpfully added to it, it is mainly my personal page. I encourage you to check it out and check those listed and watch their edits as many are here just to add liberal bias to otherwise good articles (I don't mind help). I've been pretty respectful about the whole thing, the liberals have been name calling (or trying to). Note that it is NOT in fact an article it is a note in my userspace. [[User:Richard|Richard]] 23:08, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Understood, but it is still accessable and public, making it an intimidation tactic. My edits have been politically neutral, and scientifically correct, and I have always yielded the point when I have been shown to be wrong. That is neither liberal nor conservative. The Hit List must go. You should keep it written on your desk somewhere and do your little pogrom thing less publically, although there is something to be said about you being out in the open to monitor. Actually, maybe that is a good idea....hmmm...[[User:Palmd001|PalMD]] 23:11, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :Personally I think all liberals should have to register themselves to avoide being a danger to the public. [[User:Myk|Myk]] 23:12, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
| |
| − | ::Sweet. Pretty soon after that you can start throwing the liberals in the gas chambers. Was this idea merely a drive-by statement of opinion, or something you truly think should be implemented to American society? --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 23:13, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | I think Myk was using sarcasm...Unfortunately Richard's project is extant. I still hold to my little brown shirt analogy. http://www.themodernword.com/eco/eco_blackshirt.html [[User:Palmd001|PalMD]] 23:28, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
| |
| − | ::::::Indeed I was being sarcastic. [[User:Myk|Myk]] 21:12, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
| |
| − | :Agreed. He now got me, too. I [[User talk:Sid 3050#Liberal|gave him an honest answer]], but I agree with PalMD - a list that only creates tension should be kept private. I don't need some idiot assigning labels to me in public - regardless of the label. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 07:45, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
| |