Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tea Party Movement"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with 'TEA Party - wouldn't this be a backronym? When it first started, it was just in reference to the Boston Tea Party, as far as I can tell - making it stand for something seems to h...')
 
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
TEA Party - wouldn't this be a backronym? When it first started, it was just in reference to the Boston Tea Party, as far as I can tell - making it stand for something seems to have come later. --[[User:JTutone|JTutone]] 13:20, 9 December 2009 (EST)
 
TEA Party - wouldn't this be a backronym? When it first started, it was just in reference to the Boston Tea Party, as far as I can tell - making it stand for something seems to have come later. --[[User:JTutone|JTutone]] 13:20, 9 December 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
:Since before the Tax Day Tea Parties took place, '''TEA''' was and always has stood for 'Taxed Enough Already'. There's a difference between an acronym and a theme. You should read the [[Tea Party Movement]] page, the intro will answer your question and the rest will clarify it for you. [[User:DerekE|DerekE]] 00:17, 11 December 2009 (EST)

Revision as of 05:17, December 11, 2009

TEA Party - wouldn't this be a backronym? When it first started, it was just in reference to the Boston Tea Party, as far as I can tell - making it stand for something seems to have come later. --JTutone 13:20, 9 December 2009 (EST)

Since before the Tax Day Tea Parties took place, TEA was and always has stood for 'Taxed Enough Already'. There's a difference between an acronym and a theme. You should read the Tea Party Movement page, the intro will answer your question and the rest will clarify it for you. DerekE 00:17, 11 December 2009 (EST)