Changes

Line 248: Line 248:  
If you still want evidence that Wikipedia helps students, it has certainly helped me. And before you say that all it does is teach liberal bias, I'd like to see how you bias math. In fact, Andrew used math as an example of objective truth in the interview. Wikipedia has numerous and detailed articles on numerous math topics and is an invaluable resource on learning things that the public education system never teaches.  
 
If you still want evidence that Wikipedia helps students, it has certainly helped me. And before you say that all it does is teach liberal bias, I'd like to see how you bias math. In fact, Andrew used math as an example of objective truth in the interview. Wikipedia has numerous and detailed articles on numerous math topics and is an invaluable resource on learning things that the public education system never teaches.  
 
I have been unable to find any similar math articles on Conservapedia by the way.[[User:EdmundG|EdmundG]] 21:36, 10 December 2009 (EST)
 
I have been unable to find any similar math articles on Conservapedia by the way.[[User:EdmundG|EdmundG]] 21:36, 10 December 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
:::::The National Enquirer is in no way a reputable source of information.  Nor is Wikipedia, unless you only use it for the primary sources it lists in the citations section.  6 times as liberal?  Pray tell.  How do you quantify liberality?  Is it just some litmus test you randomly developed on this site or is there some sort of physical test?  Tell me, if I support evolution, oppose gun control, and think Obama is a traitor, how many times more liberal am I than you?  Would that number change if I was believed that evolution was false?  What about if I wanted to burn all the books dealing with relativity because it distracts from reading the bible? --[[User:JAiken|JAiken]] 21:40, 10 December 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
:: I can give an example of a conservative distortions being used to cause harm, Uganda. --[[User:JAiken|JAiken]] 21:40, 10 December 2009 (EST)
13

edits