Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 148: Line 148:     
::You don't seem to understand, that wasn't an opinion, it's a fact.  If you cite an encyclopedia in a college paper, you'll be fine.  Cite wikipedia (or Conservapedia, for that matter) and you'll be marked down.  Whether you think that's right or wrong, that's how it is.  [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 21:00, 13 December 2009 (EST)
 
::You don't seem to understand, that wasn't an opinion, it's a fact.  If you cite an encyclopedia in a college paper, you'll be fine.  Cite wikipedia (or Conservapedia, for that matter) and you'll be marked down.  Whether you think that's right or wrong, that's how it is.  [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 21:00, 13 December 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
:::Ah, you've changed your definition now. You originally said 'academic paper', meaning a paper published in an academic journal for which many journals hold a policy of not citing encyclopedias but only the original source. You now say 'college paper', which I presume you mean any piece of work handed in by a student to a college. If so, the requirements come down to the standards of the college itself. I would hope that a good college would encourage students to locate, understand and cite the original source, as that will improve their education in the subject. However, if you have experience with other colleges then I accept that. However, I stand by my earlier statement that the publishing of an encyclopedia has no bearing on the validity of its entries.  [[User:nicknock|Nick]] 19:13, 13 December 2009 (MST)
    
Second, to Insufficient.  Why are you even here?  All you have done is debate on this page, even though you've admitted that you don't read the Bible.  It doesn't surprise me that your arguments are poorly formed and illogical, because you've never read the book which is the source of all logic and order.  I suggest you open your mind, take some time to go read the Bible, read some articles here on Conservapedia to learn what your liberal professors don't want you to know, and then come back and we can have some intelligent discussion. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 20:44, 13 December 2009 (EST)
 
Second, to Insufficient.  Why are you even here?  All you have done is debate on this page, even though you've admitted that you don't read the Bible.  It doesn't surprise me that your arguments are poorly formed and illogical, because you've never read the book which is the source of all logic and order.  I suggest you open your mind, take some time to go read the Bible, read some articles here on Conservapedia to learn what your liberal professors don't want you to know, and then come back and we can have some intelligent discussion. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 20:44, 13 December 2009 (EST)
12

edits

Navigation menu