Difference between revisions of "Alexander v. Sandoval"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
(→‎top: clean up & uniformity)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Justice [[Antonin Scalia]] wrote the 5-4 decision for the sharply divided court, while the [[liberal]] Justices dissented.
 
Justice [[Antonin Scalia]] wrote the 5-4 decision for the sharply divided court, while the [[liberal]] Justices dissented.
−
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
+
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]

Latest revision as of 01:18, July 13, 2016

In Alexander v. Sandoval, 532 U.S. 275 (2000), the U.S. Supreme Court held that private individuals may not sue to enforce disparate-impact regulations promulgated under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Specifically, a lawsuit could not be maintained under that law to force a state to provide a drivers' license test in a foreign language.

Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the 5-4 decision for the sharply divided court, while the liberal Justices dissented.