Difference between revisions of "Talk:Poincaré conjecture"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 4: Line 4:
 
:You're absolutely right, I misstated something.  I'll fix it now. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 21:19, 22 December 2009 (EST)
 
:You're absolutely right, I misstated something.  I'll fix it now. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 21:19, 22 December 2009 (EST)
 
::I don't know why I wrote that, I've seen a few exotic S^7s.  In my defense, this was written pretty late at night (heh). [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 21:26, 22 December 2009 (EST)
 
::I don't know why I wrote that, I've seen a few exotic S^7s.  In my defense, this was written pretty late at night (heh). [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 21:26, 22 December 2009 (EST)
 +
:::I surely understand, and great work on this page!  Would you mind if I add a link to [[fundamental group]], which looks much better than [[homotopy group]] and related pages? --[[User:JimR|JimR]] 21:33, 22 December 2009 (EST)

Revision as of 02:33, December 23, 2009

The smooth Poincare conjecture

The page states that "the h-cobordism theorem actually demonstrates that a diffeomorphism exists for n >= 5. The only open case is the four dimensional one". Perhaps I'm misunderstanding what this is supposed to mean, but I think it's false, the counterexamples being provided by the so-called exotic spheres. These are known not to exist for n=1,2,3,5,6, but there are 28 distinct smooth manifolds which are homeomorphic to the 7-sphere but not diffeomorphic to it (Milnor). For general larger n the conjecture is false, though there are a few cases (n=12 if memory serves) where it's still true. Generally the set of smooth structures on the n-sphere can be assembled into a finite abelian group. It's a tricky matter, and as noted in the article, remains open in 4 dimensions (though it's generally thought to be false). --JimR 21:03, 22 December 2009 (EST)

You're absolutely right, I misstated something. I'll fix it now. JacobB 21:19, 22 December 2009 (EST)
I don't know why I wrote that, I've seen a few exotic S^7s. In my defense, this was written pretty late at night (heh). JacobB 21:26, 22 December 2009 (EST)
I surely understand, and great work on this page! Would you mind if I add a link to fundamental group, which looks much better than homotopy group and related pages? --JimR 21:33, 22 December 2009 (EST)