Changes

423 bytes added ,  02:03, March 30, 2007
Line 145: Line 145:  
: Yes, I think that they do. Those promoting evolution describe a distinction that others do not recognize. I cited evidence. If something I said was wrong, then show me some evidence that I am wrong. Otherwise I will revert to my version.
 
: Yes, I think that they do. Those promoting evolution describe a distinction that others do not recognize. I cited evidence. If something I said was wrong, then show me some evidence that I am wrong. Otherwise I will revert to my version.
 
: Also, AmesG asks, "ether theory was discounted years ago; why cite it, I wonder?" The answer is that it was cited as a theory that lacked evidence. Whether it is currently discounted is beside the point. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 20:33, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
 
: Also, AmesG asks, "ether theory was discounted years ago; why cite it, I wonder?" The answer is that it was cited as a theory that lacked evidence. Whether it is currently discounted is beside the point. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 20:33, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
My point, sir, is that your citation wasn't evidence by any reasonable standard.  Quote mining some random newspaper article is not useful.  I can tell you from a scientists perspective (not using this as a citation obviously because it is a personal observation) that this point is absolutely obvious to most working scientists.  --[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 22:03, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
1,660

edits