Difference between revisions of "User talk:Rovereight"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: Hi there, Rovereight. We welcome all users to edit constructively, but [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bloodhound&curid=14327&diff=76473&oldid=76471&rcid=79200 this edit] is ...)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Hi there, Rovereight. We welcome all users to edit constructively, but [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bloodhound&curid=14327&diff=76473&oldid=76471&rcid=79200 this edit] is inappropriate, due to it being nonfactual, and not able to be backed up by references or citations. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 22:18, 30 March 2007 (EDT)
 
Hi there, Rovereight. We welcome all users to edit constructively, but [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bloodhound&curid=14327&diff=76473&oldid=76471&rcid=79200 this edit] is inappropriate, due to it being nonfactual, and not able to be backed up by references or citations. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 22:18, 30 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
I've spent the last 10 minutes on the internet, trying to find your source for the proposition that there are only two bloodhounds in Chicago.  Where did you get this information?  --[[User:Huey dun gotcha|Huey dun gotcha]] 22:21, 30 March 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 02:21, March 31, 2007

Hi there, Rovereight. We welcome all users to edit constructively, but this edit is inappropriate, due to it being nonfactual, and not able to be backed up by references or citations. --Hojimachongtalk 22:18, 30 March 2007 (EDT)

I've spent the last 10 minutes on the internet, trying to find your source for the proposition that there are only two bloodhounds in Chicago. Where did you get this information? --Huey dun gotcha 22:21, 30 March 2007 (EDT)