Difference between revisions of "Talk:Remarkable Jews"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::Even that would still go against the race-blind approach of this site. Ideas are what matter here, not ethnicity.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:19, 28 March 2010 (EDT) | ::Even that would still go against the race-blind approach of this site. Ideas are what matter here, not ethnicity.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:19, 28 March 2010 (EDT) | ||
| − | :::Agreed. I'm new here | + | :::Agreed. I'm new here and I don't want to come across as argumentative, but I think the entry could still have value as a reference tool from a strictly educational standpoint. Perhaps the adjective "remarkable" could be replaced with something more suitable and the information compiled here could still be retained as a category.[[User:HectorJ|HectorJ]] 21:36, 28 March 2010 (EDT) |
Revision as of 01:36, March 29, 2010
This entry violates the Conservapedia Commandments. For example, it is non-encyclopedic and non-educational. One might falsely infer that Jewish people not on the list are somehow not remarkable. This site moves beyond ethnicity but this entry seems headed in the opposite direction.
Though I appreciate many of Joaquin's contributions to this site, I must recommend the deletion of this entry for the above reasons, while welcoming praise based on merit for any individuals listed here. Comments are welcome before I delete this.--Andy Schlafly 20:58, 28 March 2010 (EDT)
- Perhaps it should be a category rather than an article.HectorJ 21:05, 28 March 2010 (EDT)
- Even that would still go against the race-blind approach of this site. Ideas are what matter here, not ethnicity.--Andy Schlafly 21:19, 28 March 2010 (EDT)
- Agreed. I'm new here and I don't want to come across as argumentative, but I think the entry could still have value as a reference tool from a strictly educational standpoint. Perhaps the adjective "remarkable" could be replaced with something more suitable and the information compiled here could still be retained as a category.HectorJ 21:36, 28 March 2010 (EDT)