Changes

m
Reverted edits by Manofnofaith (Talk) to last revision by Jpatt
Line 72: Line 72:     
Is this a corruption of the original, perhaps promoted by [[liberal]]s without regard to its authenticity?  This does not appear in any other Gospel, and the simple fact is that some of the persecutors of Jesus '''''did''''' know what they were doing.  This quotation is a favorite of liberals, although it does not appear in the earliest and best manuscripts of the Gospel of Luke. It should not appear in a [[conservative]] Bible, because in point of fact Jesus might never had said it at all.
 
Is this a corruption of the original, perhaps promoted by [[liberal]]s without regard to its authenticity?  This does not appear in any other Gospel, and the simple fact is that some of the persecutors of Jesus '''''did''''' know what they were doing.  This quotation is a favorite of liberals, although it does not appear in the earliest and best manuscripts of the Gospel of Luke. It should not appear in a [[conservative]] Bible, because in point of fact Jesus might never had said it at all.
−
  −
The version of the bible is what helped kings of the time better apply their own law within the enforcement of the religion at that time. Using the influence of climate change, (caused by a major volcanic eruption at the time and which caused major hardship and starvation at the time), the version of the bible helped the people of that time make it through the hard times while keeping their kings able to rule and further spread the message of the new testament. This translation to a common language, spread the word beyond the walls of the church control. This established a precedence for rule through a unified belief.
      
== Second Example - Dishonestly Shrewd ==
 
== Second Example - Dishonestly Shrewd ==
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487

edits