Changes

Since you are the protecting Sysop of the [[Theory of evolution]] article I wanted to let you know that Sysop Hojimachong is attempting to change the direction of the [[Theory of evolution]] article.  He also moved the webpage to [[Arguments against the theory of evolution]] which I think goes against that Aschlafy wants, because I think Aschafly wants the panel to decide the direction of the article and not for another [[Theory of evolution]] article to be created.  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:46, 31 March 2007 (EDT)conservative

Since you are the protecting Sysop of the [[Theory of evolution]] article I wanted to let you know that Sysop Hojimachong is attempting to change the direction of the [[Theory of evolution]] article.  He also moved the webpage to [[Arguments against the theory of evolution]] which I think goes against that Aschlafy wants, because I think Aschafly wants the panel to decide the direction of the article and not for another [[Theory of evolution]] article to be created.  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:46, 31 March 2007 (EDT)conservative

:I was merely reverting a disgustingly blatant example of quote-mining [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Theory_of_evolution&diff=prev&oldid=78371 here]. There is absolutely ''no'' reason to take a sourced, cited quote, and abridge it to suit your purposes. It is educationally and intellectually dishonest. Be aware that [[User:Conservative]] refuses to engage in a discussion with me, citing an obscure incident several days ago, though I have made seven attempts at civil dialogue. I have since been working under the assumption that Conservative does not have any reasoning or rationale regarding the edit at all. This is the implied stance Conservative takes. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font>^{<font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font>} 20:50, 31 March 2007 (EDT)

:I was merely reverting a disgustingly blatant example of quote-mining [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Theory_of_evolution&diff=prev&oldid=78371 here]. There is absolutely ''no'' reason to take a sourced, cited quote, and abridge it to suit your purposes. It is educationally and intellectually dishonest. Be aware that [[User:Conservative]] refuses to engage in a discussion with me, citing an obscure incident several days ago, though I have made seven attempts at civil dialogue. I have since been working under the assumption that Conservative does not have any reasoning or rationale regarding the edit at all. This is the implied stance Conservative takes. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font>^{<font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font>} 20:50, 31 March 2007 (EDT)