Difference between revisions of "Randomocracy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: '''Randomocracy''' is a theoretical form of government in which members of the government are chosen by random draft, instead of campaigning for office. It is based on [[Douglas Adams...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Randomocracy''' is a theoretical form of government in which members of the government are chosen by random [[draft]], instead of campaigning for office. It is based on [[Douglas Adams]]' famous comment that anyone who wants to wield power probably shouldn't be allowed to. | + | '''Randomocracy''' is a theoretical form of government in which members of the government are chosen by random [[draft]], instead of campaigning for office. It is based on [[Douglas Adams]]' famous comment that anyone who wants to wield power probably shouldn't be allowed to. It is similar to the system portrayed in "The Lottery in Babylon," by Jorge Luis Borges. |
Revision as of 21:51, April 1, 2007
Randomocracy is a theoretical form of government in which members of the government are chosen by random draft, instead of campaigning for office. It is based on Douglas Adams' famous comment that anyone who wants to wield power probably shouldn't be allowed to. It is similar to the system portrayed in "The Lottery in Babylon," by Jorge Luis Borges.
Positive aspects of Randomocracy
- It will result in vastly greater representation among lower-class economic castes, as opposed to the current system, where everyone is represented by wealthy white male lawyers and bankers.
- Possibly, legislation that is readable by humans will be passed.
- Since nobody campaigns for office, the enormous expenditure of effort and money of political campaigns will be obsolete.
Common Criticisms of Randomocracy
- With all legislaters only serving a single term, accountability for bribery and corruption will be drastically reduced.
- Members of unpopular beliefs and genders might be elected to office.