Changes

::Learn to read primary sources, learn to distrust the Discovery Institute, and then put these findings into fact by making useful edits.  Until you read the ''Selman'' case and the appellate record, you should not edit a description of it.  This is basic common sense and professional courtesy.  I assume that you wouldn't lampoon a colleague's mathematical proof without reading it, would you?  Then do the Georgia Federal District Court the same courtesy.

::Learn to read primary sources, learn to distrust the Discovery Institute, and then put these findings into fact by making useful edits.  Until you read the ''Selman'' case and the appellate record, you should not edit a description of it.  This is basic common sense and professional courtesy.  I assume that you wouldn't lampoon a colleague's mathematical proof without reading it, would you?  Then do the Georgia Federal District Court the same courtesy.

::Until you present findings to the contrary based on analysis of primary sources, I am reverting & modifying the article.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''_{[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]} 19:41, 1 April 2007 (EDT)

::Until you present findings to the contrary based on analysis of primary sources, I am reverting & modifying the article.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''_{[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]} 19:41, 1 April 2007 (EDT)