Difference between revisions of "Anglophile"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(exaggerate the efficacy of the National Health Service) |
(→Examples of Anglophilia: claim to have invented freedom of speech, when in fact there has never been freedom of speech in England to criticize certain people, even if entirely truthful) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*downplay or ignore how Britain perpetuated the brutal slave trade long after civilized societies (such as America) had prohibited it | *downplay or ignore how Britain perpetuated the brutal slave trade long after civilized societies (such as America) had prohibited it | ||
*exaggerate the efficacy of the [[National Health Service]] | *exaggerate the efficacy of the [[National Health Service]] | ||
| − | *admire the way the British stood alone against Nazi tyranny for two years, invented concepts such as the rule of law | + | *claim to have invented freedom of speech, when in fact there has never been freedom of speech in England to criticize certain people, even if entirely truthful |
| + | *admire the way the British stood alone against Nazi tyranny for two years, invented concepts such as the rule of law, and have devised a tolerant society where people are judged on their merits not their color or religion. | ||
*recognize the contributions that Britain has made to science and literature far out of proportion to the size of its population. | *recognize the contributions that Britain has made to science and literature far out of proportion to the size of its population. | ||
*salute the British for standing shoulder-to-shoulder with the United States for 65 years since World War 2. | *salute the British for standing shoulder-to-shoulder with the United States for 65 years since World War 2. | ||
[[category:England]] | [[category:England]] | ||
Revision as of 00:47, August 7, 2010
An Anglophile is someone who obsesses with England and exaggerates its historical significance.
Examples of Anglophilia
An Anglophile might...
- insist that William Shakespeare was the most influential person of the second millennium.
- deny how atheism has taken over the culture to the point where Richard Dawkins suggested arresting the Pope when visited
- downplay or ignore how Britain has perpetrated massive frauds on the world, such as the Piltdown Man, without any accountability
- downplay or ignore how Britain perpetuated the brutal slave trade long after civilized societies (such as America) had prohibited it
- exaggerate the efficacy of the National Health Service
- claim to have invented freedom of speech, when in fact there has never been freedom of speech in England to criticize certain people, even if entirely truthful
- admire the way the British stood alone against Nazi tyranny for two years, invented concepts such as the rule of law, and have devised a tolerant society where people are judged on their merits not their color or religion.
- recognize the contributions that Britain has made to science and literature far out of proportion to the size of its population.
- salute the British for standing shoulder-to-shoulder with the United States for 65 years since World War 2.