Conservapedia

Changes

Talk:Counterexamples to Relativity (view source)

Revision as of 15:12, August 11, 2010

208 bytes added ,  15:12, August 11, 2010
→‎Inability of theory to lead to other insights?: Relativity has been better funded than most theories, so it is a defect in the theory that it has yielded so little for the effort expended.
Line 591: Line 591:     
:: Why could this not be a failure of scientists? Anyway, what about the Dirac description of the electron? You can only claim that the theory failed to lead to other insights if you ignore the other insights. [[User:TylerGD|TylerGD]] 10:24, 11 August 2010 (EDT)
 
:: Why could this not be a failure of scientists? Anyway, what about the Dirac description of the electron? You can only claim that the theory failed to lead to other insights if you ignore the other insights. [[User:TylerGD|TylerGD]] 10:24, 11 August 2010 (EDT)
 +
 +
::: Relativity has been better funded than most theories, so it is a defect in the theory that it has yielded so little for the effort expended.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 11:12, 11 August 2010 (EDT)
    
== "from the muons' point of view, the Earth would have to be rushing in all directions to meet them"? ==
 
== "from the muons' point of view, the Earth would have to be rushing in all directions to meet them"? ==
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,310

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/804036"