Changes

504 bytes added ,  02:25, April 2, 2007
Line 171: Line 171:  
: Your latest edit says, "re-instating lower court order". Do you have a source for this? Can you show me some document from the court saying that the lower court order was reinstated? [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 22:07, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
 
: Your latest edit says, "re-instating lower court order". Do you have a source for this? Can you show me some document from the court saying that the lower court order was reinstated? [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 22:07, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
 
No, no, obviously you know more about law then me.  That's just fine.  Obviously your analysis of "Vacate" must be more accurate than someone who actually studies law, why should I worry?  Also, I'm glad you reverted to keep the shoddy, poorly-thought-out, incoherent structure, and the separation between "ACLU and Evolution" and "ACLU and the Establishment Clause."  That division makes ''good sense''.  Great job, Roger!  Ignoring experts and degrading writing - shucks, time to call it a day!-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 22:20, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
 
No, no, obviously you know more about law then me.  That's just fine.  Obviously your analysis of "Vacate" must be more accurate than someone who actually studies law, why should I worry?  Also, I'm glad you reverted to keep the shoddy, poorly-thought-out, incoherent structure, and the separation between "ACLU and Evolution" and "ACLU and the Establishment Clause."  That division makes ''good sense''.  Great job, Roger!  Ignoring experts and degrading writing - shucks, time to call it a day!-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 22:20, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
: And the order wasn't re-instated; it would have been, as the trial went the same way, but settlement was reached out of court leading to the exact same solution.  So the stickers were removed without a court order: same result, [http://www.au.org/site/News2?abbr=pr&page=NewsArticle&id=8797&security=1002&news_iv_ctrl=1241 as you can see here].-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 22:25, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
2,732

edits