Changes

278 bytes added ,  03:15, April 2, 2007
Line 177: Line 177:     
Perhaps saying, "allowing the court order to stand" makes more sense to you than "re-instating the lower court order."  Whichever way you cut it, it's more accurate than your statement is.  If you want me to count your errors, I'd be thrilled to, though.  First, you misunderstood the subtleties of "vacate."  Second, you misstated the holding of the lower court to begin with, or rather, didn't address it.  Those are two biggies.  What are the other three that I made?  But Roger, setting aside my disrespect for you intellectually, and setting aside your anger at me, let's face it - my version, with a slight revision now, is still a better statement of the truth than yours is.  It's also better formatted.  Re-instate my version, but noting that the court order was "allowed to stand," if not "re-instated," if the distinction makes you more comfortable.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 23:06, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
 
Perhaps saying, "allowing the court order to stand" makes more sense to you than "re-instating the lower court order."  Whichever way you cut it, it's more accurate than your statement is.  If you want me to count your errors, I'd be thrilled to, though.  First, you misunderstood the subtleties of "vacate."  Second, you misstated the holding of the lower court to begin with, or rather, didn't address it.  Those are two biggies.  What are the other three that I made?  But Roger, setting aside my disrespect for you intellectually, and setting aside your anger at me, let's face it - my version, with a slight revision now, is still a better statement of the truth than yours is.  It's also better formatted.  Re-instate my version, but noting that the court order was "allowed to stand," if not "re-instated," if the distinction makes you more comfortable.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 23:06, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
:I think we've both learned from each other, Roger, making my edits on the whole positive!  Now insert what you learned.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 23:15, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
2,732

edits