Difference between revisions of "Liberals Who Refuse To Debate"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(a start - please expand)
 
(added John Dingell, with his unjustified position)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
*Pro-[[abortion]] congressman Rick Boucher (Virginia)
 
*Pro-[[abortion]] congressman Rick Boucher (Virginia)
 
*Pro-[[abortion]] congressman Peter DeFazio (Oregon)
 
*Pro-[[abortion]] congressman Peter DeFazio (Oregon)
 +
*Pro-[[abortion]] congressman John Dingell (Michigan)<ref>After a poll showed him trailing, Dingell said he would debate ... shortly before [[Election Day]], which he could cancel if he improves in the polls.</ref>
 
*Pro-[[abortion]] congressman Frank Pallone (New Jersey)
 
*Pro-[[abortion]] congressman Frank Pallone (New Jersey)
 
*Pro-[[abortion]] congressman Charlie Wilson (Ohio)
 
*Pro-[[abortion]] congressman Charlie Wilson (Ohio)
 +
 +
== References ==
 +
 +
<references/>
 +
 
[[category:politics]]
 
[[category:politics]]
 
[[category:liberals]]
 
[[category:liberals]]

Revision as of 21:39, October 10, 2010

Here is a growing list of liberals in tight races who refuse to debate their opponent, thereby depriving the public of learning their real positions on the issues:

  • Pro-abortion congressman Rick Boucher (Virginia)
  • Pro-abortion congressman Peter DeFazio (Oregon)
  • Pro-abortion congressman John Dingell (Michigan)[1]
  • Pro-abortion congressman Frank Pallone (New Jersey)
  • Pro-abortion congressman Charlie Wilson (Ohio)

References

  1. ↑ After a poll showed him trailing, Dingell said he would debate ... shortly before Election Day, which he could cancel if he improves in the polls.