Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bed bug"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(thanks)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
:Liberalism is rampant also in high population centers. But if resignation was my attitude i would not have sought to provide effective solutions. WP says nothing about sulfur candles. But prayer in Jesus name is what is most effective. [[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 20:45, 19 November 2010 (EST)
 
:Liberalism is rampant also in high population centers. But if resignation was my attitude i would not have sought to provide effective solutions. WP says nothing about sulfur candles. But prayer in Jesus name is what is most effective. [[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 20:45, 19 November 2010 (EST)
 +
 +
::Thanks, Daniel, for providing a lot of information I had not seen anywhere else. I spent hours researching bed bugs when I had an infestation in  my apartment in Manhattan's [[Upper West Side]] (all bugs killed, thank God) and again in a [[Harlem]] brownstone (all dead again: I'm 2 for 2). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 22:39, 25 November 2010 (EST)

Revision as of 03:39, November 26, 2010

The liberal slant on bed bugs is "Despair! You can't kill them! (They evolve too fast for insecticides to do any good.) Just live with it." --Ed Poor Talk 13:14, 5 November 2010 (EDT)

Liberalism is rampant also in high population centers. But if resignation was my attitude i would not have sought to provide effective solutions. WP says nothing about sulfur candles. But prayer in Jesus name is what is most effective. Daniel1212 20:45, 19 November 2010 (EST)
Thanks, Daniel, for providing a lot of information I had not seen anywhere else. I spent hours researching bed bugs when I had an infestation in my apartment in Manhattan's Upper West Side (all bugs killed, thank God) and again in a Harlem brownstone (all dead again: I'm 2 for 2). --Ed Poor Talk 22:39, 25 November 2010 (EST)