SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
446
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 54:
Line 54: +
→Edits to Virgin Birth
:::::::Stating flatly that Catholics worship Mary. It's false. [[User:NKeaton|Nate]] 15:22, 31 December 2010 (EST)
:::::::Stating flatly that Catholics worship Mary. It's false. [[User:NKeaton|Nate]] 15:22, 31 December 2010 (EST)
The only thing that sentence states flatly is that Protestants ''identify'' Catholics as worshiping Mary. It's merely an attribution of a belief. Pardon my metaphor, but red-green colorblind people identify red as a grayish color, but stating that "People with red-green colorblindness identify red/green as gray" is ''clearly not'' stating flatly that red/green are the same color as gray. Does that make sense? The sentence appears very straightforward to me. If you still have a problem with it, what alternative do you propose? [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] <sup>[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]</sup> 15:27, 31 December 2010 (EST)
The only thing that sentence states flatly is that Protestants ''identify'' Catholics as worshiping Mary. It's merely an attribution of a belief. Pardon my metaphor, but red-green colorblind people identify red as a grayish color, but stating that "People with red-green colorblindness identify red/green as gray" is ''clearly not'' stating flatly that red/green are the same color as gray. Does that make sense? The sentence appears very straightforward to me. If you still have a problem with it, what alternative do you propose? [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] <sup>[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]</sup> 15:27, 31 December 2010 (EST)
::::::::I looked at the article. It's fair about the dispute Reform theology people have with Catholic faith. But the claim on this page that Catholics worship Mary is false. That's the only thing I was talking about. [[User:NKeaton|Nate]] 15:28, 31 December 2010 (EST)