Difference between revisions of "User talk:AddisonDM"

Revision as of 17:02, March 18, 2011

[[File:A Merry Christmas neon.jpg|center|300px]] ---- {{Welcome}} Hey!! Welcome to Conservapedia. [[User:BethanyS|~Beth]]^{[[User talk:BethanyS|Talk2'''ME''']]} 13:40, 15 October 2008 (EDT) '''[[User talk:AddisonDM/archive1|Archive #1]]''' == Idiots == Sorry, didn't see you had posted to the user, will unblock him, let you decide. --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]_{<small><small>/Admin</small></small>}^{[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]} 21:53, 24 June 2009 (EDT) :Thanks. [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 22:17, 24 June 2009 (EDT) == Galatians question == Sorry if this sounds sarcastic or something, but what about the accounts of "hermaphrodites" or "androgynous people"? Do those count towards "male" or "female"? Just wondering, since I'm not too well versed in the Bible anymore. [[User:JonathanG|JonG]] 12:54, 27 June 2009 (EDT) :What verses is that in? Biologically, I really don't know how you would class those people. [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 13:28, 27 June 2009 (EDT) ::It's the quote on your user page. [[User:JonathanG|JonG]] 13:57, 27 June 2009 (EDT) :::Oh haha. I don't know. I guess it depends on how you define gender, which could be by appearance, by genetics (maybe) or something. The point of the verse though is just to illustrate that every kind of person can be united in Christ. [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 13:59, 27 June 2009 (EDT) ==Moving== Thanks for cleaning all that up, now to work on those German football pages again! Yay, more tedious copying and pasting! :) [[User:JY23|JY23]] 13:51, 27 June 2009 (EDT) :Thanks. [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 13:53, 27 June 2009 (EDT) ::Actually that was my assignment for me. Sorry for any offense caused or any misunderstanding that may have occurred. [[User:JY23|JY23]] 13:55, 27 June 2009 (EDT) :::No I know that, I mean thanks for "cleaning all that up"! [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 13:57, 27 June 2009 (EDT) == Please block Dodger == Vandal/parodist. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinx McHue]] 13:23, 1 July 2009 (EDT) == Sorry... == I forgot to do what I promised you I would....but noticed you at least finally put them back. Sorry for my lack of mental acuity, Addison. --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]_{<small><small>/Admin</small></small>}^{[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]} 03:10, 17 July 2009 (EDT) :lol that's okay! [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 11:57, 17 July 2009 (EDT) == Vandals == Good work! --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 19:10, 23 July 2009 (EDT) :Thanks! It's getting to be almost boring! [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 19:14, 23 July 2009 (EDT) == Featured articles == Your help is needed. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 20:48, 1 August 2009 (EDT) --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 21:53, 19 September 2009 (EDT) : Thank you! --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 22:46, 9 August 2009 (EDT) --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 09:09, 22 September 2009 (EDT) == [[Talk:Assassin's Creed]] == There was a dispute as to fact over [[Assassin's Creed]]. I rolled it back to as you left it, and locked it to prevent further edit warring. If you are of a mind, please take a look at it, and do what you feel is best, unlock, leave locked, revert my revert, etc. Thanks! --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]_{<small><small>/Admin</small></small>}^{[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]} 17:52, 6 August 2009 (EDT) == Hello & Merry Christmas! == Nice to see you around, Addison! --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big>_/Admin^{[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]} 00:10, 6 December 2010 (EST) ==Patrolling== Thanks for today's reverts. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] ^{[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]} 16:23, 15 February 2011 (EST) == Page delete review request == Hey Addison, could you take a look at [[Conservapedia:Platform]]? It was created by [[User:Keepscases]]; I placed a delete tag on the page because the Conservapedia namespace is, to my knowledge, reserved for guidelines - which new users shouldn't be creating. Thanks! --<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 14:21, 6 March 2011 (EST) :Thanks again! Could you also delete [[Conservapedia:AFD Platform]] - where the user debated the articles merits with myself? Thanks.--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 14:57, 6 March 2011 (EST) ==Template unlock request== Hey! I made a very stupid spelling error on a template I made - spelling "Louis Brandeis" without the "o". Would you mind unlocking [[Template:Supreme Court]] so I could fix it, and then re-locking it (with cascading turned on) once I'm done? It shouldn't take more than a minute - just have to make two edits.--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 19:13, 7 March 2011 (EST) :Oop you left! Taken a deserved break, I see. In that case ignore this request! OR you could do me a huge favor and just change the typos on [[Template:Supreme Court/White]] (where it appears once) and [[Template:Supreme Court/Taft]] (four times) yourself - but if you're not comfortable doing that I can just have Andy unprotect the pages for me when we're next on at the same time. Once again thanks for the shout out tonight! And awesome work--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 19:37, 7 March 2011 (EST) :I did them myself. [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 22:35, 7 March 2011 (EST) ::ahh brilliant - thanks so much!--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 22:38, 7 March 2011 (EST) == Request == Hello AddisonDM, could you please add [[Atheism and the suppression of science]] to [[Template:Nb Atheism|this template]]? I really appreciate it! With regards, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]]^{[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]} 00:34, 8 March 2011 (EST) :I also was wondering if you could please correct [[Template:User Indian|this template]] so that the following category might be associated with the userbox: [[:Category:Indian Conservapedians]]. Thanks in advance. With regards, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]]^{[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]} 01:44, 8 March 2011 (EST) ::Hi Anupam, both done! [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 14:11, 8 March 2011 (EST) :::Hello AddisonDM, thanks for your kind help! I really appreciate it. I will try to create fewer newer categories here as you requested; I was a little unsure of how the language templates worked here so I assumed they worked like they do on Wikipedia. In regards to the [[Atheism and the suppression of science|article I created]], it now appears as the [http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=atheism+and+suppression+of+science number one article] when searched in Google with the keywords "atheism," "suppression," and "science." Furthermore, when using the keywords "suppression," "of," "science," and "christian," Google yields the article as the [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=suppression+of+science+christian&aq=f&aqi=&aql=f&oq= third one in the search]. When the keywords "suppression," "of," "science," and "catholic" are searched, Google yields the article as the [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=suppression+of+science+catholic&aq=f&aqi=&aql=f&oq= eighth choice]. The first search results are exciting to hear but the second and third search results are equally as important as well. This is because if secular individuals are trying to research the idea that the Church has persecuted science, they will find an article that talks about the suppression of science by atheists and can learn something new in that regard. Despite the fact that I only recently created this article, it has been featured in Google very quickly. In light of this fact, I am wondering if you, as an administrator, know if it can be featured on the main page of Conservapedia and if it can, could you please place the request for that or make the appropriate actions? I would really appreciate it. Thanks in advance. I look forward to hearing from you soon. With regards, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]]^{[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]} 16:56, 8 March 2011 (EST) ::::Thanks about the categories. As to that article, it is a good article but I think it could use a little more work before we would feature it on the home page. Generally, articles should have been worked on a little and more been viewed more times before we link to them from the home page. But since it is an important topic, why don't we try and improve it and then maybe put it on the home page! [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 17:37, 8 March 2011 (EST) :::::Thanks for your reply AddisionDM. As far as improvements, what are some of your suggestions? As of now, the article contains sixty-seven references. I look forward to your response. With regards, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]]^{[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]} 18:29, 8 March 2011 (EST) ::::::I thought the references were good, but it needs editing. Particularly the section about the Big Bang was a little unclear. Is your point that atheists rejected the Big Bang because it was invented by a Catholic (Christian) priest? [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 19:58, 8 March 2011 (EST) :::::::There is much information in that article. The reason they rejected the big bang is because it carried with it theological implications of ''creation ex nihilo'', a religious concept. The article states: "In light of the theistic implications of the Big Bang, Fred Hoyle, an atheist scientist did not accept the Big Bang,[36] preferring a model that did not have a single epoch of creation which would eliminate the need for a creator.[37] As a result, Fred Holyle, Thomas Gold, and Hermann Bondi developed the steady state theory, which appealed to atheist cosmologists because it avoided a creation event and the religious implications associated with one." I hope this helps. With regards, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]]^{[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]} 20:35, 8 March 2011 (EST) ::::::::Ok, that is true. I just thought it was a bit unclearly written. Do you mind if I do some minor edits on the article just to improve the flow of it (not to change any content) and then I'll see if Mr. Schlafly would like it on the home page? [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 10:40, 9 March 2011 (EST) :::::::::Sure that would be fine. I'll take a look at your revisions after you're done with it then! However, as of now, the article is neutral in that its content is supported by reliable references. When you speak with Mr. Schlafly, please let him know about its popularity on Google. I look forward to hearing from you soon. With regards, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]]^{[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]} 15:01, 10 March 2011 (EST) ::::::::::Addison DM, I also created a new article today on [[Atheism 3.0]]. Could you please add it to [[Template:Nb Atheism|this template]]? Thanks in advance! With regards, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]]^{[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]} 23:09, 10 March 2011 (EST) :::::::::::Addison DM, could you also please add [[Atheism and the suppression of science]] in a [[Template:Further|further tag]] to [[Atheism#Atheism_and_the_foundation_of_modern_science|this section]]? I would really appreciate it! Thanks, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]]^{[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]} 17:09, 11 March 2011 (EST) == Request for assistance == Hi Addison, I blocked and have been reverting the edits made by a user to the "Bias at Wikipedia" page but my computer keeps crashing when trying to revert this [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Examples_of_Bias_in_Wikipedia&curid=2896&diff=857585&oldid=856870 one last edit]. Can you assist? Thanks! [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 22:48, 17 March 2011 (EDT) :Done! [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 22:56, 17 March 2011 (EDT) ::Thanks muchly! [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 23:01, 17 March 2011 (EDT)