Changes

Line 37: Line 37:  
:::::::::::Well put, Mike.  I'd add that the [[Jesus]] mentioned the [[Flood]] in his teachings, and his [[Crucifixion]] was to redeem the sin of [[Adam]].  Evolutionists deny both the Flood and the existence of Adam.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:00, 24 March 2011 (EDT)
 
:::::::::::Well put, Mike.  I'd add that the [[Jesus]] mentioned the [[Flood]] in his teachings, and his [[Crucifixion]] was to redeem the sin of [[Adam]].  Evolutionists deny both the Flood and the existence of Adam.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:00, 24 March 2011 (EDT)
 
::::::::::::I'd go one step further and suggest strict evolutionists deny that ''Jesus'' existed! [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 21:42, 24 March 2011 (EDT)
 
::::::::::::I'd go one step further and suggest strict evolutionists deny that ''Jesus'' existed! [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 21:42, 24 March 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::::::::::::Wonderful.  Would anyone like to address any other aspect of my post?  --[[User:CecilQ|CecilQ]] 22:25, 24 March 2011 (EDT)
    
== Some of these are rather incomplete ==
 
== Some of these are rather incomplete ==
21

edits