Difference between revisions of "Syllogism"
From Conservapedia
(Changed name of hypothetical cat. At first glance, "Fluffy" read like an adjective.) |
DavidB4-bot (Talk | contribs) (→External links: clean up & uniformity) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:"John is a conservative." is an example of an incorrect syllogism, as the exclusive category "no Conservative" does not rule out other people not voting for Obama. | :"John is a conservative." is an example of an incorrect syllogism, as the exclusive category "no Conservative" does not rule out other people not voting for Obama. | ||
| − | ==External | + | ==External links== |
*[http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-logic/ Aristotle's Logic] - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | *[http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-logic/ Aristotle's Logic] - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | ||
| − | [[Category: Logic]] | + | [[Category:Logic]] |
Latest revision as of 19:59, July 13, 2016
A syllogism is a logical argument that necessarily follows if two premises are true.
- "All cats are mammals."
- "Roger is a cat."
- Therefore
- Roger is a mammal.
As linguistic tools, syllogisms are built from category words such as "all" "none" "some".
- "No conservative voted for Obama"
- "Andy is a conservative"
- therefore,
- "Andy did not vote for Obama".
One has to be careful, however, what categories are applied and assumed.
- "No conservative voted for Obama"
- "John did not vote for Obama"
- Therefore
- "John is a conservative." is an example of an incorrect syllogism, as the exclusive category "no Conservative" does not rule out other people not voting for Obama.
External links
- Aristotle's Logic - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
