Changes

334 bytes added ,  19:15, July 28, 2011
→‎quick note: new section
Line 76: Line 76:  
Sharon, your blocks have been great but I recommend not blocking longer than 5 years, except in rare cases.  Five years as a duration is long enough for someone to reconsider his attitude, or have moved away from the blocked location.  Thanks!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 19:15, 26 July 2011 (EDT)
 
Sharon, your blocks have been great but I recommend not blocking longer than 5 years, except in rare cases.  Five years as a duration is long enough for someone to reconsider his attitude, or have moved away from the blocked location.  Thanks!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 19:15, 26 July 2011 (EDT)
 
:I have changed it to five years (Hope that's OK). It is a good method to follow! [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 19:18, 26 July 2011 (EDT)
 
:I have changed it to five years (Hope that's OK). It is a good method to follow! [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 19:18, 26 July 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
== quick note ==
 +
 +
I proposed a blocking reform framework on [[User talk:Aschlafly|Aschlafly's talk page]].  In the meantime, I would not worry about being blocked. If you were blocked, which I doubt would happen, I don't foresee any problem with me getting you unblocked. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:15, 28 July 2011 (EDT)
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,427

edits