Difference between revisions of "Talk:Political Spectrum"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(one-dimensional categories of 'right' and 'left')
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Any ideas? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 12:56, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
 
Any ideas? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 12:56, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
: Some sort of y and z dimensions to the political spectrum could be explained - personal freedom vs. economic freedom?
 +
 +
PS: Does this mean that PF Fox can call the Nazis right wing now :-p ? [[User:Wikinterpreter|Wikinterpreter]]

Revision as of 17:04, April 6, 2007

  • The old one-dimensional categories of 'right' and 'left', established for the seating arrangement of the French National Assembly of 1789, are overly simplistic for today's complex political landscape. For example, who are the 'conservatives' in today's Russia? Are they the unreconstructed Stalinists, or the reformers who have adopted the right-wing views of conservatives like Margaret Thatcher ? On the standard left-right scale, how do you distinguish leftists like Stalin and Gandhi? It's not sufficient to say that Stalin was simply more left than Gandhi. There are fundamental political differences between them that the old categories on their own can't explain. Similarly, we generally describe social reactionaries as 'right-wingers', yet that leaves left-wing reactionaries like Robert Mugabe and Pol Pot off the hook. [1]

Any ideas? --Ed Poor 12:56, 6 April 2007 (EDT)

Some sort of y and z dimensions to the political spectrum could be explained - personal freedom vs. economic freedom?

PS: Does this mean that PF Fox can call the Nazis right wing now :-p ? Wikinterpreter