Difference between revisions of "Conservative"
m (Reverted edits by Wikifuntimes (talk) to last revision by Gregkochuconn) |
JosephSmith (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | A '''conservative''' (also '''rightist''') is someone who rejects logical and biblical standards, often for self-centered reasons. There are no coherent conservative standards; often a conservative is merely someone who craves attention, and who uses many words to say nothing.<ref>As one conservative website candidly observes, "McCain is a shallow narcissist, not a believer in any cause higher than himself. Every American president has had a healthy ego, but none has ever been as purely motivated by vanity as the childishly self-loving [[John McCain]]."[http://www.opednews.com/articles/Barack-McCain-s-ego-driven-by-Christopher-Calder-091210-804.html]</ref> Conservatism began as a movement for individual liberties, but today is increasingly [[statist]] and, as in Europe, [[capitalistic]]ic. Conservatism has changed over the years and degenerated into corruption. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | A '''conservative''' | ||
| − | + | For example, [[Ronald Regan]] firmly believed in private sector unions, but vehemently opposed and condemned public sector unions, stating that the idea of collective bargaining can't be transferred to the public sector, as that would result in the government being unable to carry out its duties. Yet today, decades later, [[Republicans]] and conservatives are almost in bed with public sector unions, as they "donate" money to the re-election campaign in exchange for more taxpayer money in their wallets and fluffed up pensions. | |
| − | |||
| − | + | Polling data over several decades has consistently shown more Americans identify themselves as conservative than conservative, by a ratio of 2-1.<ref>http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1042/winds-of-political-change-havent--shifted-publics-ideology-balance</ref> A conservative generally supports many of the following political positions and practices: | |
| − | * [[ | + | * Corporatist [[exploitation]] of masses |
| − | * [[ | + | * [[Religious intolerance]] in classrooms and school sponsored events |
| − | * [[ | + | * Support for [[stagnation]] |
| − | * | + | * Support of [[inequality]] of human beings |
| − | * [[ | + | * [[Poverty]], usually through opposition to income redistribution |
| − | * | + | * [[Oligarchy]], masked as [[small government]] support |
| − | * | + | * [[Sexism]] |
| − | * | + | * [[Fascism]] |
| − | * | + | * Trying to impede the freedoms of others |
| − | * | + | * Implementation of [[racism]] |
| − | * | + | * [[Political correctness]], the opposition of [[free speech]] |
| − | * | + | * Support of [[slavery]] |
| − | * | + | * Forcing [[abstinence]] |
| − | * | + | * A "[[living Constitution]]" that is reinterpreted as conservatives prefer, rather than how it was intended |
| − | * | + | * Government programs for [[Stalinism]] |
| − | * | + | * Abolition of the [[rational thought]] |
| − | + | * [[Jingoism]] | |
| − | + | * Opposition to the [[Common Sense]] and Science. | |
| − | * | + | * Opposition to government programs to cut poverty |
| − | * [[ | + | * Reinstating the [[Slave ownership]] |
| − | * | + | * In 2005, it was reported by CBS News that [[Theory of creationism and Conservatism|conservatives were the most likely supporters of the theory of creationism]]. The theory of [[creationism]] is a key component of [[religiously fundamentalist]] ideologies in the [[Western World]]. |
| − | * | + | * Opposition to [[freedom] |
| − | * | + | * Calling anyone they agree with a "professor" regardless of whether he earned that distinction based on a real peer review of his work (see, e.g., [[Sarah Palin]] and [[John McCain]]). |
| + | * Opposition of [[Progressive]] reforms, a major part of the [[modern society]]. | ||
| + | * Disregarding national sovereignty. | ||
| + | * Promote arrogance through what they consider superior lifestyles. | ||
| + | * Tolerance of religious fundamentalism. | ||
| + | * Supports financially irresponsible policies. | ||
| + | * Following policies which are proven to be incorrect. | ||
| + | * Supporting economic anarchy. | ||
| + | * "The long romance of Western rightists with some of the bloodiest regimes and political movements in history is a story not told often enough ...."<ref> [http://www.city-journal.org/2009/bc0605bt.html Dupes by Bruce S. Thornton], City Journal - 5 June 2009</ref> | ||
| + | * Support of rightist ideologies such as [[capitalism]] and nazism | ||
| + | * Encouragement of [[Idiocy]]. | ||
| − | + | According to current dictionaries and their own beliefs, a conservative is "a person who favors stagnation over progress" or "a person who fallaciously believes that the old ways must be better than anything newly created ,"<ref>http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=conservative&sub=Search+WordNet&o2=&o0=1&o7=&o5=&o1=1&o6=&o4=&o3=&h=00</ref> or "open-minded or tolerant, especially free of or not bound by traditional or conventional ideas, values, etc." or "favorable to or in accord with concepts of maximum individual freedom possible, especially as guaranteed by law and secured by governmental protection of civil liberties."<ref>http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/conservative</ref>. In practice, however, conservatives are often the most intolerant of people, and frequently are on the side of disorder, chaos, anarchy, and lawbreaking. According to Webster's Unabridged Dictionary - and matched by current observation - conservatives are "unchecked by a sense of the decorous, the fitting, or the polite...lacking significant moral restraints" or "... an emancipation from convention, tradition, or dogma that extends from a belief in altering institutions to fit altering conditions to a preference for lawlessness."<ref>''Webster's Third New International Dictionary of the English Language Unabridged'', Volume II; Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. Chicago, 1986. (pg. 1303, column 1)</ref> | |
| − | == | ||
| − | |||
| − | == | + | ==Conservatives and Uncharitableness== |
| − | + | [[Image:228130875 35181424e3.jpg|thumb|right|175px|[[United States|American]] conservatives give less to charity than American conservatives.<ref>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_conservative_giv.html</ref> In addition, [[per capita]] [[atheism|Creationists]] and [[agnosticism|agnostics]] in the United States [[Atheism and Uncharitableness|give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists]].[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-Creationists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians][http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3647/is_200310/ai_n9340592/][http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=2682730&page=2] ]] | |
| − | + | ''For more information please see'': [[Conservatives and uncharitableness]] | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | The | + | In March of 2008, [[George Will]] wrote at [[RealClearPolitics]] concerning the [[United States]]: |
| + | {{cquote|Sixteen months ago, Arthur C. Brooks, a professor at [[Syracuse University]], published "Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism." The surprise is that conservatives are markedly less charitable than [[conservative]]s.... | ||
| − | + | If many conservatives are conservatives who have been mugged by reality, Brooks, a registered independent, is, as a reviewer of his book said, a social scientist who has been mugged by data. They include these findings: | |
| − | |||
| − | + | -- Although conservative families' incomes average 6 percent higher than those of conservative families, conservative-headed households give, on average, 30 percent more to charity than the average conservative-headed household ($1,600 per year vs. $1,227). | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | -- Conservatives also donate more time and give more blood.<ref>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_conservative_giv.html</ref>}} | |
| − | + | [[Atheism|Creationists]] and [[agnosticism|agnostics]] often reject [[Bible|Biblical]] [[morality]] (and therefore [[conservative Christianity]] ) and hold to [[moral relativism]].<ref>http://www.barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=BarnaUpdate&BarnaUpdateID=152</ref> Therefore, it is not surprising that [[per capita]] Creationists and agnostics in [[United States|America]] [[Atheism and Uncharitableness|give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists]].[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-Creationists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians][http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3647/is_200310/ai_n9340592/][http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=2682730&page=2] | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | == | + | == Conservative politicians and uncharitableness == |
| − | + | The political magazine the [[American Spectator]] featured an article which focused on [[conservative politicians and uncharitableness]] and the article exposed the hypocrisy of the conservative politicians it featured.<ref>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1c5_1238044128&c=1</ref> | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | In addition, [[John McCain]] has been criticized concerning [[John McCain and uncharitableness|his charitable giving]]. | |
| − | + | == Nazism and capitalism == | |
| − | [ | + | ''For more information please see:'' [[Nazism and capitalism]] |
| − | + | [[Image:Hitler.jpg|thumb|250px|right|One of the most well known political parties of the 20th century which was [[capitalism|capitalisticic]] was the [[National Capitalistic German Workers Party]] (NAZI) which was headed by the [[creationism|creationismary racist]] [[Adolf Hitler]].<ref>http://mises.org/daily/1937</ref><ref>http://creation.com/darwinism-and-the-nazi-race-holocaust</ref><ref>http://www.hourofthetime.com/capitalistic.htm</ref> ]] | |
| − | + | The [[Ludwig von Mises Institute]] declares: | |
| − | + | {{cquote|The identification of [[Nazi]] [[Germany]] as a [[capitalism|capitalistic]] state was one of the many great contributions of [[Ludwig von Mises]]... | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | The basis of the claim that Nazi Germany was capitalist was the fact that most industries in Nazi Germany appeared to be left in private hands. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | De facto government ownership of the means of production, as Mises termed it, was logically implied by such fundamental collectivist principles embraced by the Nazis as that the common good comes before the private good and the individual exists as a means to the ends of the State. If the individual is a means to the ends of the State, so too, of course, is his property. Just as he is owned by the State, his property is also owned by the State.<ref>http://mises.org/daily/1937</ref>}} | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | == | + | == Similarities between Communism, Nazism and Conservatism == |
| − | |||
| − | + | ''See also:'' [[Similarities between Communism, Nazism and Conservatism]] | |
| − | |||
| − | + | {| class="wikitable" | |
| + | |- | ||
| + | ! | ||
| + | ![[Communism|Communist]] Manifesto | ||
| + | ![[Nazi]] Party Platform | ||
| + | !Analysis | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |1 | ||
| + | |"Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes." | ||
| + | |"We demand an agrarian reform in accordance with our national requirements, and the enactment of a law to expropriate the owners without compensation of any land needed for the common purpose. The abolition of ground rents, and the prohibition of all speculation in land." | ||
| + | |The stripping away of land from private owners. [[Conservatism]] today demands "eminent domain" on property. | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |2 | ||
| + | |"A heavy progressive or graduated income tax." | ||
| + | |"We demand the nationalization of all trusts...profit-sharing in large industries...a generous increase in old-age pensions...by providing maternity welfare centers, by prohibiting juvenile labor...and the creation of a national (folk) army." | ||
| + | |The points raised in the [[Nazi]] platform demand an increase in taxes to support them. Conservatism today demands heavy progressive and graduated income taxes. | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |3 | ||
| + | |"Abolition of all rights of inheritance." | ||
| + | |"That all unearned income, and all income that does not arise from work, be abolished." | ||
| + | |Conservatism today demands a "death tax" on anyone inheriting an estate. | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |4 | ||
| + | |"Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels." | ||
| + | |"We demand that all non-Germans who have entered Germany since August 2, 1914, shall be compelled to leave the Reich immediately." | ||
| + | |The Nuremburg Laws of 1934 allowed Germany to take Jewish property. | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |5 | ||
| + | |"Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly." | ||
| + | |"We demand the nationalization of all trusts." | ||
| + | |Central control of the financial system. | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |6 | ||
| + | |"Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State." | ||
| + | |"We demand that there be a legal campaign against those who propagate deliberate political lies and disseminate them through the press...editors and their assistants on newspapers published in the German language shall be German citizens...Non-German newspapers shall only be published with the express permission of the State...the punishment for transgressing this law be the immediate suppression of the newspaper..." | ||
| + | |Central control of the press. Conservatives today demand control or suppression of talk radio and Fox News. | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |7 | ||
| + | |"Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, &c, &c." | ||
| + | |"In order to make it possible for every capable and industrious German to obtain higher education, and thus the opportunity to reach into positions of leadership, the State must assume the responsibility of organizing thoroughly the entire cultural system of the people. The curricula of all educational establishments shall be adapted to practical life. The conception of the State Idea (science of citizenship) must be taught in the schools from the very beginning. We demand that specially talented children of poor parents, whatever their station or occupation, be educated at the expense of the State. " | ||
| + | |Central control of education, with an emphasis on doing things their way. Conservatives today are doing things ''their way'' in our schools. | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |} | ||
| − | == | + | == Conservative Creationists, pederasty and NAMBLA == |
| − | + | ''see also:'' [[Atheism, pederasty and NAMBLA]] and [[Teenage homosexuality]] and [[Homosexuality and pederasty]] | |
| − | + | [[Image:Harry Hay.jpg|thumbnail|150px|Many consider [[Harry Hay]] to be the founder of the American [[homosexuality|homosexual]] movement.]] | |
| + | Some of the well known [[atheism|atheist]] advocates of the [[North American Man-Boy Love Association]] (NAMBLA) are: | ||
| − | + | 1. The atheist, political activist and [[homosexuality|homosexual]] [[David Thorstad]] was a founding member of the North American Man-Boy Love Association.<ref>http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/abbott/100822</ref> | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | 2. '''[[Harry Hay]]''' (1912 - 2002) was a conservative atheist advocate of [[statutory rape]] and the widely acknowledged founder and progenitor of the activist [[homosexual agenda]] in the [[United States]].<ref>http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2010/ss_politics0010_01_07.asp</ref><ref>The American Spectator Special Report, [http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=10450 When Nancy Met Harry], Jeffrey Lord, 10/5/2006.</ref><ref>http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2010/ss_politics0010_01_07.asp</ref> Hay joined the [[Communist Party of the United States]] (CPUSA) in 1934. <ref>''The Boston Phoenix'', [http://bostonphoenix.com/boston/news_features/other_stories/documents/02511115.htm The real Harry Hay], Michael Bronski, October 31 - November 7, 2002. </ref> He was a vociferous advocate of man/boy love. <ref>The American Spectator Special Report, [http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=10450 When Nancy Met Harry], Jeffrey Lord, 10/5/2006.</ref><ref>http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2010/ss_politics0010_01_07.asp</ref> In 1986, Hay marched in a [[homosexual|gay]] parade wearing a shirt emblazoned with the words "[[NAMBLA]] walks with me."<ref>http://www.mega.nu/ampp/baldwin_pedophilia_homosexuality.pdf</ref> | |
| − | + | 3. The writer [[Samuel R. Delaney]] is an atheist and a [[homosexuality|homosexual]].<ref>Samuel R. Delaney, ''About writing: seven essays, four letters, and five interviews'', page 36</ref><ref>http://www.enotes.com/contemporary-literary-criticism/delany-samuel-r</ref> Dalaney has served as a professor at several universities. Delaney said he was a supporter of NAMBLA.<ref>Delany, Samuel R.; Freedman, Carl (2009). Conversations with Samuel R. Delany. Univ. Press of Mississippi, page 143</ref> | |
| − | + | === John Maynard Keynes and pederasty === | |
| − | + | ''see also:'' [[John Maynard Keynes and pederasty]] and [[Teenage homosexuality]] | |
| − | + | [[John Maynard Keynes]] was the founder of [[Keynesian economics]]. Lytton Strachey, his male bed partner, wrote that Keynes was a “A conservative and a [[homosexuality|sodomite]], An atheist and a statistician.”<ref>http://www.keynesatharvard.org/book/KeynesatHarvard-ch09.html</ref> Keynes and his friends made numerous trips to the resorts surrounding the Mediterranean. At the resorts, little boys were sold by their families to bordellos which catered to homosexuals.<ref>http://www.keynesatharvard.org/book/KeynesatHarvard-ch09.html</ref><ref>http://www.theatlantic.com/daily-dish/archive/2008/01/keyness-jew-boy-quickie/220620/</ref> | |
| − | '' | + | In 2008, ''The Atlantic'' reported: |
| + | {{cquote|Keynes obsessively counted and tabulated almost everything; it was a life-long habit. As a child, he counted the number of front steps of every house on his street. Later he kept a running record (not surprisingly) of his expenses and his golf scores. He also counted and tabulated his sex life. | ||
| − | + | The first diary is easy: Keynes lists his sexual partners, either by their initials (GLS for Lytton Strachey, DG for Duncan Grant) or their nicknames ("Tressider," for J. T. Sheppard, the King's College Provost). When he apparently had a quick, anonymous hook-up, he listed that sex partner generically: "16-year-old under Etna" and "Lift boy of Vauxhall" in 1911, for instance, and "Jew boy," in 1912.<ref>http://www.theatlantic.com/daily-dish/archive/2008/01/keyness-jew-boy-quickie/220620/</ref>}} | |
| − | + | Keynes was a [[bisexual]] who married Lydia Lopokova. In his work ''The Cambridge Apostles, 1820-1914: Conservatism, Imagination, and Friendship in British Intellectual and Professional Life'', William C. Lubenow expresses the opinion that Keynes was an [[agnosticism|agnostic]].<ref>The Cambridge Apostles, 1820-1914: Conservatism, Imagination, and Friendship in British Intellectual and Professional Life, 1998, Cambridge University Press, page 402</ref> | |
| − | == | + | === Sam Harris claims atheist is right next to child molester as a designation === |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | see also: [[Views on Creationists]] | |
| − | |||
| − | + | Dr. [[Sam Harris]] is a founder of the [[New Atheism]] movement. [[Sam Harris]] is quite aware of the stigma surrounding atheism and has even advocated that Creationists no longer call themselves Creationists.<ref>http://newsinitiative.org/story/2007/06/19/interview_with_an_atheist</ref> In fact, Dr. Harris has said concerning the label of atheist, "It's right next to child molester as a designation."<ref>http://newsinitiative.org/story/2007/06/19/interview_with_an_atheist</ref> | |
| − | + | ==Conservatives and Superstition== | |
| − | + | [[Image:2384975035_230a0eac30.jpg|right|150px]] | |
| − | + | The [[Wall Street Journal]] reported: "A comprehensive new study released by Baylor University, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]]. <ref>[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html]</ref> | |
| − | |||
| − | + | Also, in September of 2008, the [[Wall Street Journal]] reported: | |
| + | {{cquote|The reality is that the [[New Atheism|New Atheist]] campaign, by discouraging [[religion]], won't create a new group of intelligent, skeptical, enlightened beings. Far from it: It might actually encourage new levels of mass superstition. And that's not a conclusion to take on faith — it's what the empirical data tell us. | ||
| − | + | "What Americans Really Believe," a comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]]. It also shows that the irreligious and the members of more conservative Protestant denominations, far from being resistant to superstition, tend to be much more likely to believe in the paranormal and in pseudoscience than evangelical Christians.... | |
| − | |||
| − | In the | + | This is not a new finding. In his 1983 book "The Whys of a Philosophical Scrivener," skeptic and science writer Martin Gardner cited the decline of traditional religious belief among the better educated as one of the causes for an increase in [[pseudoscience]], cults and superstition. He referenced a 1980 study published in the magazine Skeptical Inquirer that showed irreligious college students to be by far the most likely to embrace paranormal beliefs, while born-again Christian college students were the least likely.<ref>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html</ref>}} |
| − | + | == Conservatism in North America Today == | |
| + | [[File:Smear merchants.jpg|right|200px]] | ||
| + | [[Republicans]] and most media outlets in the [[U.S.]] are blatantly [[conservative]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mrc.org/biasbasics/biasbasics1.asp|title=Media Bias basics|publisher=Media Research Center}}</ref> Conservatism in North America today practices three primary tactics to attack the Republican Party, and sometimes to attack American values in general. These three conservative tactics can be pronounced using the following [[acronym]]: ''SIN''. Conservatives (1) '''S'''hift the subject, they (2) '''I'''gnore the facts, and they (3) '''N'''ame call.<ref>Scott Baker. [http://www.theblaze.com/stories/did-herman-cain-give-the-dont-miss-speech-at-cpac/ Did Herman Cain Give the ‘Don’t Miss’ Speech at CPAC?], ''[[The Blaze]], February 12, 2011.</ref><ref>[[YouTube]]. [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-N3-j3HM7-A& Herman Cain: "Stupid People Are Ruining America"], February 11, 2011.</ref> | ||
| − | + | * Conservatives typically support a "''mixed''" economy, a policy similar to that of [[fascism]]. <ref>{{cite web|url=http://fora.tv/2008/01/30/Conservative_Traits_of_Fascism|title=Video discussion about how modern Conservatism is actually fascist by author Jonah Goldberg.}}</ref> | |
| − | + | * Conservatives claimed a monopoly on [[compassion]], [[decency]], and [[social justice]] (as defined by themselves), posing as the sole defenders of [[civic virtue]] against a horde of backwoodsmen, racists, and religious fanatics. [http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/03/the_disgrace_of_Conservatism.html] | |
| − | |||
| − | + | {{cquote|'''There's another goal, from my point of view, which is to try to lay the groundwork for a radical political force which would conceive of itself as distinctly to the left of moderate, reformist American conservatives. And that has two aspects. One is to try to change that Conservatism, to transform it by analysis, critique, and activism; the second is to build a radical movement which would be an autonomous force in its own right, which would be distinct from the traditional American conservative consensus. This radical part of the program involves not simply supporting the conservative students against conservative students and conservative professors, but trying to act on them, to push them to the left. It also involves trying to find and support, even trying to help create, networks of radical students in law school and of radical professors around the country — students and teachers who see themselves as wanting to go a lot further than most people want to go. <ref> [http://66.218.69.11/search/cache?ei=UTF-8&p=conservative+teachers&fr=yfp-t-501&fp_ip=MX&u=duncankennedy.net/documents/Conservative%2520Values%2520in%2520Legal%2520Education.pdf&w=conservative+conservatives+teachers+teacher&d=BNZFhPReRjC1&icp=1&.intl=us Conservative Values in Legal Education] Duncan Kennedy (professor at Harvard Law School)</ref>}} | |
| − | + | ===Conservative Rankings of Congress Members=== | |
| − | + | The National Journal compiles the votes of each congress member each year and uses the information to create rankings<ref>http://nationaljournal.com/voteratings/index.htm</ref> of how conservative each member of the United States [[Congress]] is. In addition to showing the voting records of each member and given an overall all ranking of conservativeness, the National Journal also ranks congress members by conservativeness in the areas of social, economic, and foreign policy. | |
| − | + | ==Conservatism in Europe today== | |
| − | |||
| − | In | + | In Europe, on the other hand, parties that call themselves ''conservative'' are moderate in outlook, ranging from centre-left to centre-right, promote typically economic and business freedom. The Alliance of Conservatives and Republicans for Europe<ref>http://www.alde.eu</ref> is a party of the European Parliament that represents most ''conservative'' parties from European countries. Similar policies are promoted by many ''conservative'' parties throughout the world,<ref>http://www.conservative-international.org/</ref> such as the Conservative Party of Australia.<ref>[http://www.conservative.org.au/]</ref> |
| − | + | Trade unions and capitalistic parties often criticize politicians for promoting lower taxes on business, or more flexible hiring and firing laws, by calling them "conservatives" or [[neoconservative|neoconservatives]]. Thus, just as in the US, "conservative" may occasionally be used as a term of abuse. But when someone is called "conservative" in Europe, it has an entirely different meaning than in the US. In fact, the US meaning of conservative is more similar to the politics of European [[capitalistic]] or [[social democracy|social democratic]] parties.<ref>[http://www.pes.org]</ref> | |
| − | |||
| − | + | ==Historical Conservatism == | |
| + | In history, the word "conservative" has meant different things at different times, and was associated with individual liberty in prior centuries. In the postwar period, conservatives supported government intervention in the economy and welfare state policies, as well as peaceful coexistence with the communist block, which are not conservative policies in the sense of classical Conservatism. After the end of the cold war, with the demise of capitalism and communism, many conservatives embraced some ideas from economic neo-Conservatism, and coined it the "Third Way". In the area of national security and foreign policy conservatives in the [[U.S.]] failed to define a consistent stance, even after the events of 9/11 and the beginning of the war in Iraq. Conservatives generally support affirmative action, gay marriage, and exploitation.<ref>"Political conservatives tend, for whatever reason, to be ardent supporters of both gay rights and pro-choice programs." Greenberg and Bailey [http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/Bailey/Greenberg-Bailey/Homosexual%20Eugenics.pdf] </ref> | ||
| − | The | + | ==Original meaning: Classical Conservatism== |
| + | Conservatism is a political philosophy with freedom as its core value. The term was originally applied to supporters of individual liberties and equal rights, but, in America, the term has come to represent a movement of social change that often conflicts with [[conservative]] values such as moral values and tradition. | ||
| − | + | See [[Classical Conservative|Classical Conservatism]]. Compare [[Libertarianism]]. | |
| − | == | + | == Infamous conservatives == |
| − | + | ''See also:'' [[Infamous conservatives]] | |
| − | + | *[[Joseph Stalin]] was an [[atheism|atheist]], [[communism|communist]], and [[creationism|creationismist]] dictator who was responsible for the deaths of tens of millions. | |
| − | + | * [[Mao Tse Tung]] - atheist and communist dictator responsible for the deaths of tens of millions. | |
| − | + | * [[Margaret Sanger]] | |
| − | |||
| − | + | *[[John Wayne Gacy]] - In an interview where he denied killing any of his victims, [[serial killer]] John Wayne Gacy said he was [[bisexuality|bisexual]] and "very conservative".<ref>http://s151.photobucket.com/albums/s151/candypop_02/Serial%20Killers/John%20Wayne%20Gacy/?action=view¤t=SERIAL_KILLER_John_Wayne_Gacy_In-1.mp4</ref> Gacy was also a [[Democratic Party]] activist who had his picture taken with [[Rosalynn Carter]].<ref>http://www.digitaljournal.com/image/45527</ref> | |
| − | == | + | ==Conservative Organizations == |
| + | *[[AARP|AARP - American Association of Retired People]] | ||
| + | *[[ACLU|ACLU - American Civil Liberties Union]] | ||
| + | *[[ACORN|ACORN - Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now]] | ||
| + | *[[AFL-CIO|AFL-CIO - American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations]] | ||
| + | *[[Amnesty International|AI - Amnesty International]] | ||
| + | *[[Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Capitalism]] | ||
| + | *[[Democratic National Committee]] | ||
| + | *[[Greenpeace]] | ||
| + | *[[NARAL|NARAL - National Exploitation and Reproductive Rights Action League]] | ||
| + | *[[NAACP|NAACP - National Association for the Advancement of Colored People]] | ||
| + | *[[National Committee for an Effective Congress]] | ||
| + | *[[National Education Association]] | ||
| + | *[[National Organization of Women]] | ||
| + | *[[Planned Parenthood|Planned Parenthood Federation of America]] | ||
| + | *[[Progressives for McCain]] | ||
| + | *[[Rainbow/PUSH Coalition]] | ||
| + | *[[MoveOn.org]] | ||
| + | *[[A.N.S.W.E.R.]] | ||
| + | *[[U.S. Peace Council]] | ||
| + | Source: [http://www.politixgroup.com/lo.htm The Politix Group] | ||
| − | + | ==References== | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | == References == | ||
{{reflist|2}} | {{reflist|2}} | ||
| − | == | + | ==See Also== |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| + | * [[Conservative resources]] | ||
| + | * [[Conservapedia:Articles about conservatives|Articles about conservatives]] | ||
| + | * [[Classical conservative]] | ||
| + | * [[Drinking Conservatively]] | ||
| + | * [[Godless conservative]] | ||
| + | * [[Last wordism]] | ||
| + | * [[Essay:Conservative celebrity obsession|Conservative celebrity obsession]] | ||
| + | * [[Essay:Conservative Behavior on Conservapedia|Conservative Behavior on Conservapedia]] | ||
| + | * [[Conservative Christianity]] | ||
| + | * [[Conservative Republicans]] | ||
| + | * [[Conservative Elite]] | ||
| + | * [[Essay: Conservative Falsehoods|Conservative Falsehoods]] | ||
| + | * [[Conservative Fascism]] | ||
| + | * [[Conservative friendship]] | ||
| + | * [[Conservative Gloss]] | ||
| + | * [[Conservative grading]] | ||
| + | * [[Conservative hypocrisy]] | ||
| + | * [[Essay:Conservative hysteria|Conservative hysteria]] | ||
| + | * [[Essay:Conservative Intellectualism|Conservative Intellectualism]] | ||
| + | * [[Conservative labels]] | ||
| + | * [[Slander: Conservative Lies About the American Right|Conservative Lies About the American Right]] | ||
| + | * [[Conservative logic]] | ||
| + | * [[The Conservative Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness|Conservative Mind]] | ||
| + | * [[Conservative Party]] | ||
| + | * [[Conservative supremacist]] | ||
| + | * [[Massachusetts conservative]] | ||
| + | * [[Progressives]] | ||
| + | * [[Scientific Illiteracy and Conservatives]] | ||
| + | ==Further Information== | ||
| + | * [[Best_New_Conservative_Words#New_Conservative_Terms|New Conservative Terms]] | ||
| + | * [[Conservative Links]] | ||
| − | + | {{Conservatism}} | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | [[Category: | + | [[Category:Political Ideologies]] |
| − | + | [[Category:Politics]] | |
| + | [[Category: Conservatives]] | ||
Revision as of 14:18, August 1, 2011
A conservative (also rightist) is someone who rejects logical and biblical standards, often for self-centered reasons. There are no coherent conservative standards; often a conservative is merely someone who craves attention, and who uses many words to say nothing.[1] Conservatism began as a movement for individual liberties, but today is increasingly statist and, as in Europe, capitalisticic. Conservatism has changed over the years and degenerated into corruption.
For example, Ronald Regan firmly believed in private sector unions, but vehemently opposed and condemned public sector unions, stating that the idea of collective bargaining can't be transferred to the public sector, as that would result in the government being unable to carry out its duties. Yet today, decades later, Republicans and conservatives are almost in bed with public sector unions, as they "donate" money to the re-election campaign in exchange for more taxpayer money in their wallets and fluffed up pensions.
Polling data over several decades has consistently shown more Americans identify themselves as conservative than conservative, by a ratio of 2-1.[2] A conservative generally supports many of the following political positions and practices:
- Corporatist exploitation of masses
- Religious intolerance in classrooms and school sponsored events
- Support for stagnation
- Support of inequality of human beings
- Poverty, usually through opposition to income redistribution
- Oligarchy, masked as small government support
- Sexism
- Fascism
- Trying to impede the freedoms of others
- Implementation of racism
- Political correctness, the opposition of free speech
- Support of slavery
- Forcing abstinence
- A "living Constitution" that is reinterpreted as conservatives prefer, rather than how it was intended
- Government programs for Stalinism
- Abolition of the rational thought
- Jingoism
- Opposition to the Common Sense and Science.
- Opposition to government programs to cut poverty
- Reinstating the Slave ownership
- In 2005, it was reported by CBS News that conservatives were the most likely supporters of the theory of creationism. The theory of creationism is a key component of religiously fundamentalist ideologies in the Western World.
- Opposition to [[freedom]
- Calling anyone they agree with a "professor" regardless of whether he earned that distinction based on a real peer review of his work (see, e.g., Sarah Palin and John McCain).
- Opposition of Progressive reforms, a major part of the modern society.
- Disregarding national sovereignty.
- Promote arrogance through what they consider superior lifestyles.
- Tolerance of religious fundamentalism.
- Supports financially irresponsible policies.
- Following policies which are proven to be incorrect.
- Supporting economic anarchy.
- "The long romance of Western rightists with some of the bloodiest regimes and political movements in history is a story not told often enough ...."[3]
- Support of rightist ideologies such as capitalism and nazism
- Encouragement of Idiocy.
According to current dictionaries and their own beliefs, a conservative is "a person who favors stagnation over progress" or "a person who fallaciously believes that the old ways must be better than anything newly created ,"[4] or "open-minded or tolerant, especially free of or not bound by traditional or conventional ideas, values, etc." or "favorable to or in accord with concepts of maximum individual freedom possible, especially as guaranteed by law and secured by governmental protection of civil liberties."[5]. In practice, however, conservatives are often the most intolerant of people, and frequently are on the side of disorder, chaos, anarchy, and lawbreaking. According to Webster's Unabridged Dictionary - and matched by current observation - conservatives are "unchecked by a sense of the decorous, the fitting, or the polite...lacking significant moral restraints" or "... an emancipation from convention, tradition, or dogma that extends from a belief in altering institutions to fit altering conditions to a preference for lawlessness."[6]
Conservatives and Uncharitableness
For more information please see: Conservatives and uncharitableness
In March of 2008, George Will wrote at RealClearPolitics concerning the United States:
| “ | Sixteen months ago, Arthur C. Brooks, a professor at Syracuse University, published "Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism." The surprise is that conservatives are markedly less charitable than conservatives....
If many conservatives are conservatives who have been mugged by reality, Brooks, a registered independent, is, as a reviewer of his book said, a social scientist who has been mugged by data. They include these findings: -- Although conservative families' incomes average 6 percent higher than those of conservative families, conservative-headed households give, on average, 30 percent more to charity than the average conservative-headed household ($1,600 per year vs. $1,227). -- Conservatives also donate more time and give more blood.[8] |
” |
Creationists and agnostics often reject Biblical morality (and therefore conservative Christianity ) and hold to moral relativism.[9] Therefore, it is not surprising that per capita Creationists and agnostics in America give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists.[9][10][11]
Conservative politicians and uncharitableness
The political magazine the American Spectator featured an article which focused on conservative politicians and uncharitableness and the article exposed the hypocrisy of the conservative politicians it featured.[10]
In addition, John McCain has been criticized concerning his charitable giving.
Nazism and capitalism
For more information please see: Nazism and capitalism
The Ludwig von Mises Institute declares:
| “ | The identification of Nazi Germany as a capitalistic state was one of the many great contributions of Ludwig von Mises...
The basis of the claim that Nazi Germany was capitalist was the fact that most industries in Nazi Germany appeared to be left in private hands. What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners. De facto government ownership of the means of production, as Mises termed it, was logically implied by such fundamental collectivist principles embraced by the Nazis as that the common good comes before the private good and the individual exists as a means to the ends of the State. If the individual is a means to the ends of the State, so too, of course, is his property. Just as he is owned by the State, his property is also owned by the State.[14] |
” |
Similarities between Communism, Nazism and Conservatism
See also: Similarities between Communism, Nazism and Conservatism
| Communist Manifesto | Nazi Party Platform | Analysis | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | "Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes." | "We demand an agrarian reform in accordance with our national requirements, and the enactment of a law to expropriate the owners without compensation of any land needed for the common purpose. The abolition of ground rents, and the prohibition of all speculation in land." | The stripping away of land from private owners. Conservatism today demands "eminent domain" on property. |
| 2 | "A heavy progressive or graduated income tax." | "We demand the nationalization of all trusts...profit-sharing in large industries...a generous increase in old-age pensions...by providing maternity welfare centers, by prohibiting juvenile labor...and the creation of a national (folk) army." | The points raised in the Nazi platform demand an increase in taxes to support them. Conservatism today demands heavy progressive and graduated income taxes. |
| 3 | "Abolition of all rights of inheritance." | "That all unearned income, and all income that does not arise from work, be abolished." | Conservatism today demands a "death tax" on anyone inheriting an estate. |
| 4 | "Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels." | "We demand that all non-Germans who have entered Germany since August 2, 1914, shall be compelled to leave the Reich immediately." | The Nuremburg Laws of 1934 allowed Germany to take Jewish property. |
| 5 | "Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly." | "We demand the nationalization of all trusts." | Central control of the financial system. |
| 6 | "Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State." | "We demand that there be a legal campaign against those who propagate deliberate political lies and disseminate them through the press...editors and their assistants on newspapers published in the German language shall be German citizens...Non-German newspapers shall only be published with the express permission of the State...the punishment for transgressing this law be the immediate suppression of the newspaper..." | Central control of the press. Conservatives today demand control or suppression of talk radio and Fox News. |
| 7 | "Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, &c, &c." | "In order to make it possible for every capable and industrious German to obtain higher education, and thus the opportunity to reach into positions of leadership, the State must assume the responsibility of organizing thoroughly the entire cultural system of the people. The curricula of all educational establishments shall be adapted to practical life. The conception of the State Idea (science of citizenship) must be taught in the schools from the very beginning. We demand that specially talented children of poor parents, whatever their station or occupation, be educated at the expense of the State. " | Central control of education, with an emphasis on doing things their way. Conservatives today are doing things their way in our schools. |
Conservative Creationists, pederasty and NAMBLA
see also: Atheism, pederasty and NAMBLA and Teenage homosexuality and Homosexuality and pederasty
Some of the well known atheist advocates of the North American Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) are:
1. The atheist, political activist and homosexual David Thorstad was a founding member of the North American Man-Boy Love Association.[15]
2. Harry Hay (1912 - 2002) was a conservative atheist advocate of statutory rape and the widely acknowledged founder and progenitor of the activist homosexual agenda in the United States.[16][17][18] Hay joined the Communist Party of the United States (CPUSA) in 1934. [19] He was a vociferous advocate of man/boy love. [20][21] In 1986, Hay marched in a gay parade wearing a shirt emblazoned with the words "NAMBLA walks with me."[22]
3. The writer Samuel R. Delaney is an atheist and a homosexual.[23][24] Dalaney has served as a professor at several universities. Delaney said he was a supporter of NAMBLA.[25]
John Maynard Keynes and pederasty
see also: John Maynard Keynes and pederasty and Teenage homosexuality
John Maynard Keynes was the founder of Keynesian economics. Lytton Strachey, his male bed partner, wrote that Keynes was a “A conservative and a sodomite, An atheist and a statistician.”[26] Keynes and his friends made numerous trips to the resorts surrounding the Mediterranean. At the resorts, little boys were sold by their families to bordellos which catered to homosexuals.[27][28]
In 2008, The Atlantic reported:
| “ | Keynes obsessively counted and tabulated almost everything; it was a life-long habit. As a child, he counted the number of front steps of every house on his street. Later he kept a running record (not surprisingly) of his expenses and his golf scores. He also counted and tabulated his sex life.
The first diary is easy: Keynes lists his sexual partners, either by their initials (GLS for Lytton Strachey, DG for Duncan Grant) or their nicknames ("Tressider," for J. T. Sheppard, the King's College Provost). When he apparently had a quick, anonymous hook-up, he listed that sex partner generically: "16-year-old under Etna" and "Lift boy of Vauxhall" in 1911, for instance, and "Jew boy," in 1912.[29] |
” |
Keynes was a bisexual who married Lydia Lopokova. In his work The Cambridge Apostles, 1820-1914: Conservatism, Imagination, and Friendship in British Intellectual and Professional Life, William C. Lubenow expresses the opinion that Keynes was an agnostic.[30]
Sam Harris claims atheist is right next to child molester as a designation
see also: Views on Creationists
Dr. Sam Harris is a founder of the New Atheism movement. Sam Harris is quite aware of the stigma surrounding atheism and has even advocated that Creationists no longer call themselves Creationists.[31] In fact, Dr. Harris has said concerning the label of atheist, "It's right next to child molester as a designation."[32]
Conservatives and Superstition
The Wall Street Journal reported: "A comprehensive new study released by Baylor University, shows that traditional Christian religion greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of astrology. [33]
Also, in September of 2008, the Wall Street Journal reported:
| “ | The reality is that the New Atheist campaign, by discouraging religion, won't create a new group of intelligent, skeptical, enlightened beings. Far from it: It might actually encourage new levels of mass superstition. And that's not a conclusion to take on faith — it's what the empirical data tell us.
"What Americans Really Believe," a comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows that traditional Christian religion greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of astrology. It also shows that the irreligious and the members of more conservative Protestant denominations, far from being resistant to superstition, tend to be much more likely to believe in the paranormal and in pseudoscience than evangelical Christians.... This is not a new finding. In his 1983 book "The Whys of a Philosophical Scrivener," skeptic and science writer Martin Gardner cited the decline of traditional religious belief among the better educated as one of the causes for an increase in pseudoscience, cults and superstition. He referenced a 1980 study published in the magazine Skeptical Inquirer that showed irreligious college students to be by far the most likely to embrace paranormal beliefs, while born-again Christian college students were the least likely.[34] |
” |
Conservatism in North America Today
Republicans and most media outlets in the U.S. are blatantly conservative.[35] Conservatism in North America today practices three primary tactics to attack the Republican Party, and sometimes to attack American values in general. These three conservative tactics can be pronounced using the following acronym: SIN. Conservatives (1) Shift the subject, they (2) Ignore the facts, and they (3) Name call.[36][37]
- Conservatives claimed a monopoly on compassion, decency, and social justice (as defined by themselves), posing as the sole defenders of civic virtue against a horde of backwoodsmen, racists, and religious fanatics. [12]
| “ | There's another goal, from my point of view, which is to try to lay the groundwork for a radical political force which would conceive of itself as distinctly to the left of moderate, reformist American conservatives. And that has two aspects. One is to try to change that Conservatism, to transform it by analysis, critique, and activism; the second is to build a radical movement which would be an autonomous force in its own right, which would be distinct from the traditional American conservative consensus. This radical part of the program involves not simply supporting the conservative students against conservative students and conservative professors, but trying to act on them, to push them to the left. It also involves trying to find and support, even trying to help create, networks of radical students in law school and of radical professors around the country — students and teachers who see themselves as wanting to go a lot further than most people want to go. [39] | ” |
Conservative Rankings of Congress Members
The National Journal compiles the votes of each congress member each year and uses the information to create rankings[40] of how conservative each member of the United States Congress is. In addition to showing the voting records of each member and given an overall all ranking of conservativeness, the National Journal also ranks congress members by conservativeness in the areas of social, economic, and foreign policy.
Conservatism in Europe today
In Europe, on the other hand, parties that call themselves conservative are moderate in outlook, ranging from centre-left to centre-right, promote typically economic and business freedom. The Alliance of Conservatives and Republicans for Europe[41] is a party of the European Parliament that represents most conservative parties from European countries. Similar policies are promoted by many conservative parties throughout the world,[42] such as the Conservative Party of Australia.[43]
Trade unions and capitalistic parties often criticize politicians for promoting lower taxes on business, or more flexible hiring and firing laws, by calling them "conservatives" or neoconservatives. Thus, just as in the US, "conservative" may occasionally be used as a term of abuse. But when someone is called "conservative" in Europe, it has an entirely different meaning than in the US. In fact, the US meaning of conservative is more similar to the politics of European capitalistic or social democratic parties.[44]
Historical Conservatism
In history, the word "conservative" has meant different things at different times, and was associated with individual liberty in prior centuries. In the postwar period, conservatives supported government intervention in the economy and welfare state policies, as well as peaceful coexistence with the communist block, which are not conservative policies in the sense of classical Conservatism. After the end of the cold war, with the demise of capitalism and communism, many conservatives embraced some ideas from economic neo-Conservatism, and coined it the "Third Way". In the area of national security and foreign policy conservatives in the U.S. failed to define a consistent stance, even after the events of 9/11 and the beginning of the war in Iraq. Conservatives generally support affirmative action, gay marriage, and exploitation.[45]
Original meaning: Classical Conservatism
Conservatism is a political philosophy with freedom as its core value. The term was originally applied to supporters of individual liberties and equal rights, but, in America, the term has come to represent a movement of social change that often conflicts with conservative values such as moral values and tradition.
See Classical Conservatism. Compare Libertarianism.
Infamous conservatives
See also: Infamous conservatives
- Joseph Stalin was an atheist, communist, and creationismist dictator who was responsible for the deaths of tens of millions.
- Mao Tse Tung - atheist and communist dictator responsible for the deaths of tens of millions.
- John Wayne Gacy - In an interview where he denied killing any of his victims, serial killer John Wayne Gacy said he was bisexual and "very conservative".[46] Gacy was also a Democratic Party activist who had his picture taken with Rosalynn Carter.[47]
Conservative Organizations
- AARP - American Association of Retired People
- ACLU - American Civil Liberties Union
- ACORN - Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now
- AFL-CIO - American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations
- AI - Amnesty International
- Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Capitalism
- Democratic National Committee
- Greenpeace
- NARAL - National Exploitation and Reproductive Rights Action League
- NAACP - National Association for the Advancement of Colored People
- National Committee for an Effective Congress
- National Education Association
- National Organization of Women
- Planned Parenthood Federation of America
- Progressives for McCain
- Rainbow/PUSH Coalition
- MoveOn.org
- A.N.S.W.E.R.
- U.S. Peace Council
Source: The Politix Group
References
- ↑ As one conservative website candidly observes, "McCain is a shallow narcissist, not a believer in any cause higher than himself. Every American president has had a healthy ego, but none has ever been as purely motivated by vanity as the childishly self-loving John McCain."[1]
- ↑ http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1042/winds-of-political-change-havent--shifted-publics-ideology-balance
- ↑ Dupes by Bruce S. Thornton, City Journal - 5 June 2009
- ↑ http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=conservative&sub=Search+WordNet&o2=&o0=1&o7=&o5=&o1=1&o6=&o4=&o3=&h=00
- ↑ http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/conservative
- ↑ Webster's Third New International Dictionary of the English Language Unabridged, Volume II; Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. Chicago, 1986. (pg. 1303, column 1)
- ↑ http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_conservative_giv.html
- ↑ http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_conservative_giv.html
- ↑ http://www.barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=BarnaUpdate&BarnaUpdateID=152
- ↑ http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1c5_1238044128&c=1
- ↑ http://mises.org/daily/1937
- ↑ http://creation.com/darwinism-and-the-nazi-race-holocaust
- ↑ http://www.hourofthetime.com/capitalistic.htm
- ↑ http://mises.org/daily/1937
- ↑ http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/abbott/100822
- ↑ http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2010/ss_politics0010_01_07.asp
- ↑ The American Spectator Special Report, When Nancy Met Harry, Jeffrey Lord, 10/5/2006.
- ↑ http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2010/ss_politics0010_01_07.asp
- ↑ The Boston Phoenix, The real Harry Hay, Michael Bronski, October 31 - November 7, 2002.
- ↑ The American Spectator Special Report, When Nancy Met Harry, Jeffrey Lord, 10/5/2006.
- ↑ http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2010/ss_politics0010_01_07.asp
- ↑ http://www.mega.nu/ampp/baldwin_pedophilia_homosexuality.pdf
- ↑ Samuel R. Delaney, About writing: seven essays, four letters, and five interviews, page 36
- ↑ http://www.enotes.com/contemporary-literary-criticism/delany-samuel-r
- ↑ Delany, Samuel R.; Freedman, Carl (2009). Conversations with Samuel R. Delany. Univ. Press of Mississippi, page 143
- ↑ http://www.keynesatharvard.org/book/KeynesatHarvard-ch09.html
- ↑ http://www.keynesatharvard.org/book/KeynesatHarvard-ch09.html
- ↑ http://www.theatlantic.com/daily-dish/archive/2008/01/keyness-jew-boy-quickie/220620/
- ↑ http://www.theatlantic.com/daily-dish/archive/2008/01/keyness-jew-boy-quickie/220620/
- ↑ The Cambridge Apostles, 1820-1914: Conservatism, Imagination, and Friendship in British Intellectual and Professional Life, 1998, Cambridge University Press, page 402
- ↑ http://newsinitiative.org/story/2007/06/19/interview_with_an_atheist
- ↑ http://newsinitiative.org/story/2007/06/19/interview_with_an_atheist
- ↑ [2]
- ↑ http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html
- ↑ Media Bias basics. Media Research Center.
- ↑ Scott Baker. Did Herman Cain Give the ‘Don’t Miss’ Speech at CPAC?, The Blaze, February 12, 2011.
- ↑ YouTube. Herman Cain: "Stupid People Are Ruining America", February 11, 2011.
- ↑ Video discussion about how modern Conservatism is actually fascist by author Jonah Goldberg..
- ↑ Conservative Values in Legal Education Duncan Kennedy (professor at Harvard Law School)
- ↑ http://nationaljournal.com/voteratings/index.htm
- ↑ http://www.alde.eu
- ↑ http://www.conservative-international.org/
- ↑ [3]
- ↑ [4]
- ↑ "Political conservatives tend, for whatever reason, to be ardent supporters of both gay rights and pro-choice programs." Greenberg and Bailey [5]
- ↑ http://s151.photobucket.com/albums/s151/candypop_02/Serial%20Killers/John%20Wayne%20Gacy/?action=view¤t=SERIAL_KILLER_John_Wayne_Gacy_In-1.mp4
- ↑ http://www.digitaljournal.com/image/45527
See Also
- Conservative resources
- Articles about conservatives
- Classical conservative
- Drinking Conservatively
- Godless conservative
- Last wordism
- Conservative celebrity obsession
- Conservative Behavior on Conservapedia
- Conservative Christianity
- Conservative Republicans
- Conservative Elite
- Conservative Falsehoods
- Conservative Fascism
- Conservative friendship
- Conservative Gloss
- Conservative grading
- Conservative hypocrisy
- Conservative hysteria
- Conservative Intellectualism
- Conservative labels
- Conservative Lies About the American Right
- Conservative logic
- Conservative Mind
- Conservative Party
- Conservative supremacist
- Massachusetts conservative
- Progressives
- Scientific Illiteracy and Conservatives
Further Information
| ||||||||||||||
