Difference between revisions of "Talk:Creation Science"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(What does this have to do with the Scopes trial?) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:ID was developed to overcome to legal shortcomings of creation science, I sketched the bare bones of the issue just now. [[User:Teresita|Teresita]] 22:53, 6 April 2007 (EDT) | :ID was developed to overcome to legal shortcomings of creation science, I sketched the bare bones of the issue just now. [[User:Teresita|Teresita]] 22:53, 6 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Admission== | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Creation Science admitted Genesis as its primary source, but attempted to gain at least equal time for the teaching of evolution, a humble goal considering that in the 1925 Scopes "Monkey" trial the defendent was in fact found guilty of breaking the Butler law in Tennessee prohibiting the teaching of evolution. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'm not sure about this: admitted, attempted, humble goal? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 16:02, 9 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:02, April 9, 2007
Umm...creation science doesn't equal intelligent design. It includes stuff like noah's flood geology, and magic changing isotopes, which ID doesn't touch upon. RDre 11:34, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
- Agreed. I blanked the page, pending a correct definition.
- Note, however, that groups like E. Scott's NCSE assert that ID is creationist. She never loses an opportunity to refer to ID as "Intelligent Design Creationism". --Ed Poor 17:18, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
- ID was developed to overcome to legal shortcomings of creation science, I sketched the bare bones of the issue just now. Teresita 22:53, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
Admission
- Creation Science admitted Genesis as its primary source, but attempted to gain at least equal time for the teaching of evolution, a humble goal considering that in the 1925 Scopes "Monkey" trial the defendent was in fact found guilty of breaking the Butler law in Tennessee prohibiting the teaching of evolution.
I'm not sure about this: admitted, attempted, humble goal? --Ed Poor 16:02, 9 April 2007 (EDT)