Changes

===There is more to gravitation than refuting the Big Bang===

===There is more to gravitation than refuting the Big Bang===

This more is that except explaining the gravitational force by seeking by the particles the most probable location in spacetime, location of lowest energy, pushing in the process on the other particles with a force that is presently called ''gravitational force''

This more is that except explaining the gravitational force by particles seeking the most probable location in spacetime of lowest energy, pushing in the process on other particles with a force that is called ''gravitational force''

:<math>F=-(d/dx)[E=mc^2(d\tau/dt)]</math>

:<math>F=-(d/dx)[E=mc^2(d\tau/dt)]</math>

where <math>x</math> is displacement, <math>E</math> is energy of particle, rest or total, <math>m</math> is mass of particle [[invariant mass|invariant]] or [[relativistic mass|"relativistic"]], as energy, depending on application, <math>c</math> is speed of light in vacuum, <math>\tau</math> is proper time of particle, and <math>t</math>, is the time of observer. The most prominent difference between the old prejudice of expansion of universe and reality is the flat spacetime proposed in 1993 by [[Jayant Narlikar]] and [[Halton Arp]]<ref>Narlikar, J. and Arp, H. Flat spactime cosmology - a unified framework for extragalactic redshifts, 1993, Astrophysical Journal, Part 1. </ref>. Instead of [[curvature of spacetime]] of the [[Big Bang]] hypothesis. One of the most idiotic hypothesis in physics, which happened almost a century after Einsteins (Mileva Marić and Albert, who explained it as I write about it in my ''"[[Gravitation demystified]]"'' though with nobody, especially cosmologists, paying any attention). Possibly for low popularity of CP as scientific wiki.

where <math>x</math> is displacement in relation to the particle, <math>E</math> is energy of particle, rest or total, rest or total, depending on application, <math>m</math> is mass of particle [[invariant mass|invariant]] or [[relativistic mass|"relativistic"]] <math>m</math>, as energy, depending on application, <math>c</math> is speed of light in vacuum, <math>\tau</math> is proper time of particle, and <math>t</math>, is the time of observer. The most prominent difference between the old prejudice of expansion and reality is the flat spacetime proposed in 1993 by [[Jayant Narlikar]] and [[Halton Arp]]<ref>Narlikar, J. and Arp, H. Flat spactime cosmology - a unified framework for extragalactic redshifts, 1993, Astrophysical Journal, Part 1. </ref>. Explained in my ''"[[Gravitation demystified]]"'', not noticed possibly for low popularity of CP as scientific wiki :).

The flat spacetime requires coupling between time and space such that it makes the time running slower in curved space proportionally to the exponent of distance in the curved space (see the exact relation below).  

The flat spacetime requires coupling between time and space such that it makes the time running slower in curved space proportionally to the exponent of distance in the curved space (see the exact relation below).  

According to exact calculations, that in this case the Newtonian calculations are (and not refuted yet by any cosmologist, while several looked at them including a professor of mathematics teaching a few years earlier the General Relativity in Cambridge, Massachusetts <ref>Prof. Tadeusz Bałaban, presently tenured professor at [[Rutgers University]] in New Jersey, who checked the calculations in February 1985 before saying that they don't contain any mathematical errors, after which they were sent them to ''[["Nature"]]'', where the editor rejected them for his disbelief of them without any peer review.</ref> the universe is stationary, as it was assumed in the first Einsteins model universe of 1917, its [[Hubble constant]], ratio of cosmological redshift to the distance from our Galaxy, in reality the Hubble constant turns out to be  

According to exact calculations, not refuted yet by any cosmologist, while several looked at them including a professor of mathematics teaching a few years earlier the General Relativity in Cambridge, Massachusetts <ref>Prof. Tadeusz Bałaban, presently tenured professor at [[Rutgers University]] in New Jersey, who checked the calculations in February 1985 before saying that they don't contain any mathematical errors, after which they were sent them to ''[["Nature"]]'', where the editor rejected them for his disbelief of them without any peer review.</ref> the universe is stationary, as it was assumed in the first Einsteins model universe of 1917. Its [[Hubble constant]] in reality turns out to be  

:<math>H_o=c/R_E=70km/s/Mpc</math>,  

:<math>H_o=c/R_E=70km/s/Mpc</math>,  

:<math>6 \times 10^{-27}kg/m^3</math>  

:<math>6 \times 10^{-27}kg/m^3</math>  

considered realistic by astronomers. The illusion of accelerating expansion comes out as  

considered realistic by astronomers who read the derivation. The illusion of accelerating expansion comes out as  

:<math>dH/dt=-H_o^2/2</math>  

:<math>dH/dt=-H_o^2/2</math>  

that was observed in 1998 with accuracy of one standard deviation. Therefore confirmed observationally, with maximum accuracy, with which we need to confirm observationally the theoretically predicted numbers to consder them in perfect agreement with observation.

that was observed in 1998 with accuracy of one standard deviation. Therefore confirmed observationally, with maximum accuracy, with which we need to confirm observationally the theoretically predicted numbers.

The almost Newtonian calculations suggest that time in deep space galaxies changes with distance from our Galaxy as  

The almost Newtonian calculations (with accuracy to <math>E=mc^2</math>) suggest that time in deep space galaxies changes with distance from our Galaxy as  

:<math>d \tau/dt=exp(-r/R_E)</math>,  

:<math>d \tau/dt=exp(-r/R_E)</math>,  

where <math>\tau</math> is proper time of distant galaxy, <math>t</math> is our time (in our Galaxy), <math>r</math> is distance to this remote galaxy, and <math>R_E</math> is the mentioned already [[Einstein's radius]].

where <math>\tau</math> is proper time of distant galaxy, <math>t</math> is our time (in our Galaxy), <math>r</math> is distance to this remote galaxy, and <math>R_E</math> is the mentioned already [[Einstein's radius]].

Why Newtonian calculations in flat space produce as a result [[Einstein's radius]] of curvature of space?  

Why Newtonian calculations in flat space produce as a result [[Einstein's radius]] of curvature of space? Isn't it something to wonder about? Not to mention the simple calculation of observed cosmological redshift and its acceleration. Isn't it a proof telling that the Big Bang is a fake refuted by the lack of expansion of universe?<ref>And we remember that science works only through rejection of false claimes of various cranks. Didn't Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler the authors of 1973 ''"Gravitation"'', that started the [[Big Bang]] craze, turned out to be such cranks despite their mathematical sophistication? Which only proved that math is not science, which we knew anyway.</ref>

 

Isn't it something to wonder about? Not to mention the simple calculation of observed cosmological redshift and its acceleration. Isn't it a proof telling that the Big Bang is a fake?<ref>And we remember that science works only through rejection of false clames of various cranks. Didn't Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler the authors of 1973 ''"Gravitation"'', that started the [[Big Bang]] craze, turned out to be such cranks despite their mathematical sophistication? Which only proved that math is not science, which we knew anyway.</ref>

===And what happened to gravitational energy?===

===And what happened to gravitational energy?===