Changes

Line 169: Line 169:  
:::::No, I understood just fine. This is a list of 15 questions ''for evolutionists'' to answer not for creationists to answer. So you can't complain when he gives you an evolutionist answer! You also failed to address the rest of his post. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 23:03, 13 September 2011 (EDT)
 
:::::No, I understood just fine. This is a list of 15 questions ''for evolutionists'' to answer not for creationists to answer. So you can't complain when he gives you an evolutionist answer! You also failed to address the rest of his post. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 23:03, 13 September 2011 (EDT)
 
:::SamCoulter, is atheism merely a lack of belief in the existence of God or gods? Is there a [[Atheism|significant amount of encyclopedias of philosophy that take issue with that notion]]? If so, which ones? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 00:49, 14 September 2011 (EDT)
 
:::SamCoulter, is atheism merely a lack of belief in the existence of God or gods? Is there a [[Atheism|significant amount of encyclopedias of philosophy that take issue with that notion]]? If so, which ones? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 00:49, 14 September 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::"A-" Without. "-theism" Belief in gods. "Atheism" Without belief in gods. Anybody can say whatever they like about what they personally think "atheism" means, but atheists say it means a lack of belief in gods. Do WE let THEM tell us what Christianity means? If not, why should THEY let US define what atheism means? Sorry, but if we want to argue against their point of view we need to let them state what that point of view actually is. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 01:08, 14 September 2011 (EDT)
539

edits