Difference between revisions of "Talk:Atheism and bestiality"
From Conservapedia
(→I don't even know what to say about this article...) |
(→Absolutely revolting. Andy Schlafly, please put an end to this.) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:What's next? '''''Atheism and mastur<nowiki />bation'''''? Oh wait, [[Conservapedia:Deletedpage|mastur<nowiki />bation]] is a naughty word - even the spam-filter doesn't like it. Bestiality should be added to the list! [[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 17:15, 22 September 2011 (EDT) | :What's next? '''''Atheism and mastur<nowiki />bation'''''? Oh wait, [[Conservapedia:Deletedpage|mastur<nowiki />bation]] is a naughty word - even the spam-filter doesn't like it. Bestiality should be added to the list! [[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 17:15, 22 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::Yeah this is really bad, not that anything else this user has done has been that much better. -1 for lack of fatty fat fat ad hominems and lack of bunny photos. --[[User:MarkN85|MarkN85]] 17:20, 22 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:20, September 22, 2011
I don't even know what to say about this article...
I was going to leave Conservapedia but when I see this kind of article, I just can't. Conservative, do you know that you are becoming very offensive?
I heard that you were always eager to debate. I have a lot of questions about christianity & atheism that I would like to discuss. Would you be willing to answer my questions ?--ARamis 16:56, 22 September 2011 (EDT)
Absolutely revolting. Andy Schlafly, please put an end to this.
Disgusted. As a Christian I am reviled by this. There are no links that support what this Peter Singer said, merely heresy from another website which doesn't state its sources. Then it is taken to paint a group of people in the same stripe. Absolutely immoral, unsupported filth. MaxFletcher 17:14, 22 September 2011 (EDT)
- What's next? Atheism and masturbation? Oh wait, masturbation is a naughty word - even the spam-filter doesn't like it. Bestiality should be added to the list! RonLar 17:15, 22 September 2011 (EDT)
- Yeah this is really bad, not that anything else this user has done has been that much better. -1 for lack of fatty fat fat ad hominems and lack of bunny photos. --MarkN85 17:20, 22 September 2011 (EDT)
